<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Clean Energy: The State of the States	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 22:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: RickR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RickR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 22:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg

Only slightly off topic, I think you and your readers will be interested in this: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wvgazettemail.com/article/20151027/GZ01/151029546/1419&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Coal not coming back, Appalachian Power president says&lt;/a&gt;

(apologies if you&#039;ve already seen and posted on it)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg</p>
<p>Only slightly off topic, I think you and your readers will be interested in this:<br />
<a href="http://www.wvgazettemail.com/article/20151027/GZ01/151029546/1419" rel="nofollow">Coal not coming back, Appalachian Power president says</a></p>
<p>(apologies if you&#8217;ve already seen and posted on it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473407</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[#3
One more thing. The higher you go, the better the resource. The important wind speeds are the cut in and optimal speeds. Large, modern turbines would have no problem with the Texas wind, so the current average size would be due to other (historical, political, economic) factors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3<br />
One more thing. The higher you go, the better the resource. The important wind speeds are the cut in and optimal speeds. Large, modern turbines would have no problem with the Texas wind, so the current average size would be due to other (historical, political, economic) factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[#3

http://apps2.eere.energy.gov/wind/windexchange/windmaps/

If you look at the upper left hand map, you&#039;ll notice that there&#039;s a corridor from North Dakota to Texas with excellent wind resources. Even though these states are governed by Republicans, they&#039;re among the country&#039;s leaders in wind energy, and have wind lobbies that can block initiatives designed to make electricity from wind more expensive.

I don&#039;t know how the size of Texas turbines compares to that of other states, but you could easily look into it by clicking on as many states as you want and doing your calculations. You might also find something by googling: U.S. wind turbines average size/capacity 2015.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3</p>
<p><a href="http://apps2.eere.energy.gov/wind/windexchange/windmaps/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://apps2.eere.energy.gov/wind/windexchange/windmaps/</a></p>
<p>If you look at the upper left hand map, you&#8217;ll notice that there&#8217;s a corridor from North Dakota to Texas with excellent wind resources. Even though these states are governed by Republicans, they&#8217;re among the country&#8217;s leaders in wind energy, and have wind lobbies that can block initiatives designed to make electricity from wind more expensive.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how the size of Texas turbines compares to that of other states, but you could easily look into it by clicking on as many states as you want and doing your calculations. You might also find something by googling: U.S. wind turbines average size/capacity 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 23:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; &#039;You are going to find people in this town who say they are for ‘all of the above’ energy, but they’re really for none of the above and all of the below,&#039; he said, underscoring his support for aboveground wind and solar resources.&quot;
http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/will-conservatives-finally-embrace-clean-energy?intcid=mod-latest 

The &quot;he&quot; is Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa. The article shows that an increasing number of Republicans accept the reality of climate change, and that some of them are pushing for positive changes in American energy policy. It seems that the party&#039;s presidential candidates are in line with the fossil fuel companies, but not with a large number of their voters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; &#8216;You are going to find people in this town who say they are for ‘all of the above’ energy, but they’re really for none of the above and all of the below,&#8217; he said, underscoring his support for aboveground wind and solar resources.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/will-conservatives-finally-embrace-clean-energy?intcid=mod-latest" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/will-conservatives-finally-embrace-clean-energy?intcid=mod-latest</a> </p>
<p>The &#8220;he&#8221; is Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa. The article shows that an increasing number of Republicans accept the reality of climate change, and that some of them are pushing for positive changes in American energy policy. It seems that the party&#8217;s presidential candidates are in line with the fossil fuel companies, but not with a large number of their voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Alder		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Alder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 23:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[#2 thanks. So according to figures in that pdf they are averaging 1.68 MW per tower - by today&#039;s standards that on the low side.  I&#039;ve never been to TX so is the wind there, while plentiful enough for generation, not fast enough to get into the 2.5-5MW range that other places are, or is it a case of the hardware they are using?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 thanks. So according to figures in that pdf they are averaging 1.68 MW per tower &#8211; by today&#8217;s standards that on the low side.  I&#8217;ve never been to TX so is the wind there, while plentiful enough for generation, not fast enough to get into the 2.5-5MW range that other places are, or is it a case of the hardware they are using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 23:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[#1
Please see:
http://awea.files.cms-plus.com/FileDownloads/pdfs/texas.pdf 

Texas leads the U.S. in installed capacity, but is behind leaders like Iowa in the percentage of electricity produced by wind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1<br />
Please see:<br />
<a href="http://awea.files.cms-plus.com/FileDownloads/pdfs/texas.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://awea.files.cms-plus.com/FileDownloads/pdfs/texas.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Texas leads the U.S. in installed capacity, but is behind leaders like Iowa in the percentage of electricity produced by wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Alder		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/30/clean-energy-the-state-of-the-states/#comment-473402</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Alder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21745#comment-473402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought Texas was doing better recently having heard about a lot of wind generation there but energy.gov says

&quot;Renewable sources provide 2.55% of Texas&#039;s energy production, totaling 303,697 billion BTUs. This is 4.03% of total U.S. renewable energy production.&quot;

see http://energy.gov/maps/renewable-energy-production-state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Texas was doing better recently having heard about a lot of wind generation there but energy.gov says</p>
<p>&#8220;Renewable sources provide 2.55% of Texas&#8217;s energy production, totaling 303,697 billion BTUs. This is 4.03% of total U.S. renewable energy production.&#8221;</p>
<p>see <a href="http://energy.gov/maps/renewable-energy-production-state" rel="nofollow ugc">http://energy.gov/maps/renewable-energy-production-state</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
