<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: GOP Presidential Primary Polls	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/15/gop-presidential-primary-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/15/gop-presidential-primary-polls/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 03:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/15/gop-presidential-primary-polls/#comment-473078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 03:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21682#comment-473078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure &quot;top&quot; candidates is quite the right word given their quality. Then again &quot;leading&quot; or &quot;highest&quot; and least of all &quot;best&quot; hardly fit either.  

Still reckon it&#039;ll be  Jeb! Bush vs Hilary Clinton for the 2016 US elections but not as sure of that as I once was. Just such an unimpressive, crazy mob to choose from Repubs wise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure &#8220;top&#8221; candidates is quite the right word given their quality. Then again &#8220;leading&#8221; or &#8220;highest&#8221; and least of all &#8220;best&#8221; hardly fit either.  </p>
<p>Still reckon it&#8217;ll be  Jeb! Bush vs Hilary Clinton for the 2016 US elections but not as sure of that as I once was. Just such an unimpressive, crazy mob to choose from Repubs wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph M.		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/10/15/gop-presidential-primary-polls/#comment-473077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 07:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21682#comment-473077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apropos of this topic (vis-à-vis U.S. presidential election predictability), there&#039;s an interesting view expressed in this Wednesday (10/14) blog from Reuter&#039;s:

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/14/forget-what-you-saw-last-night-two-simple-reasons-a-republican-is-likely-to-win-in-2016/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apropos of this topic (vis-à-vis U.S. presidential election predictability), there&#8217;s an interesting view expressed in this Wednesday (10/14) blog from Reuter&#8217;s:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/14/forget-what-you-saw-last-night-two-simple-reasons-a-republican-is-likely-to-win-in-2016/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/14/forget-what-you-saw-last-night-two-simple-reasons-a-republican-is-likely-to-win-in-2016/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
