<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CSI Gets AP To Change Style Manual. But They Got It Wrong	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/09/22/center-for-inquiry-gets-ap-to-change-style-manual-but-they-got-it-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/09/22/center-for-inquiry-gets-ap-to-change-style-manual-but-they-got-it-wrong/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 01:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: I have no doubt AP got this wrong: climate science contrarians are deniers. &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/09/22/center-for-inquiry-gets-ap-to-change-style-manual-but-they-got-it-wrong/#comment-472362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I have no doubt AP got this wrong: climate science contrarians are deniers. &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21573#comment-472362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] AP went along with it. Just a couple of days ago, AP changed their style guide to specify that the word [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] AP went along with it. Just a couple of days ago, AP changed their style guide to specify that the word [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/09/22/center-for-inquiry-gets-ap-to-change-style-manual-but-they-got-it-wrong/#comment-472361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21573#comment-472361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t work well as a nominative.  But also, &quot;alternative&quot; connotes a sense of legitimacy, as though there were multiple, valid options to pick &#038; choose from.  One wouldn&#039;t refer to astrology as an &quot;alternative science&quot; -- it&#039;s not science; it&#039;s mythology and superstition.  We need a word that indicates a rejection of science and an embracing of groundless, &quot;because I want it to be this way&quot; childishness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t work well as a nominative.  But also, &#8220;alternative&#8221; connotes a sense of legitimacy, as though there were multiple, valid options to pick &amp; choose from.  One wouldn&#8217;t refer to astrology as an &#8220;alternative science&#8221; &#8212; it&#8217;s not science; it&#8217;s mythology and superstition.  We need a word that indicates a rejection of science and an embracing of groundless, &#8220;because I want it to be this way&#8221; childishness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Craig Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/09/22/center-for-inquiry-gets-ap-to-change-style-manual-but-they-got-it-wrong/#comment-472360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21573#comment-472360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe the term &quot;alternative&quot; is suitable?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the term &#8220;alternative&#8221; is suitable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/09/22/center-for-inquiry-gets-ap-to-change-style-manual-but-they-got-it-wrong/#comment-472359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21573#comment-472359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t “those who reject mainstream climate science” imply that there are other (reputable) &quot;non-mainstream&quot; climate sciences that the science deniers subscribe to instead?

Last I checked, &quot;science is science&quot;, and there doesn&#039;t exist an alternative; alternatives are &quot;not science&quot;, and often &quot;anti-science&quot;.

How about &quot;thralls&quot; or &quot;ideologues&quot; if they don&#039;t like the term &quot;deniers&quot;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t “those who reject mainstream climate science” imply that there are other (reputable) &#8220;non-mainstream&#8221; climate sciences that the science deniers subscribe to instead?</p>
<p>Last I checked, &#8220;science is science&#8221;, and there doesn&#8217;t exist an alternative; alternatives are &#8220;not science&#8221;, and often &#8220;anti-science&#8221;.</p>
<p>How about &#8220;thralls&#8221; or &#8220;ideologues&#8221; if they don&#8217;t like the term &#8220;deniers&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
