Globally we our emitting 40 – 50 Billion Toxic Tons of Carbon Dioxide a Year.

The United States emitted 6.8 Billion Toxic Tons of Carbon Dioxide in 2014

In the 1850s – 1870s parts per million of Carbon in our atmosphere was between 260 – 280.

In the 1980s, there was 350 ppm of Carbon.

2015 – 404 ppm in Our Atmosphere.
We have passed the 1C. baseline Temp Increase !

India, Pakistan, Japan, and the Middle East, Record Breaking, Killing Heat Waves !

The Pacific Ocean is 3 – 8 degrees warmer than Normal, and flowing in to the Arctic Ocean !

Massive Whales,Salmon, Starfish, Sea Lions, Sea Stars, Sea Urchins, and Bird Die – Offs !

The Jet Stream is acting like a balloon that is loosing air.

The Arctic Ice and Snow may be gone at the end of this Summer or Next. A Huge Natural Cooler for the Northern Hemisphere, that no man or woman has ever lived without !

The meeting in Paris, should be about Closing the Fossil Fuel Faucet.

“Professor Chris Field is bullshitting the planet. On whether 1.5C is still feasible” Kevin Hester

“The message is already clear, that if the world does want to strive to limit warming to 1.5C or less, we don’t have very much of the carbon budget left.” Professeor Chris Field

“There is no carbon budget any more and 5C is baked in according to both Shell petroleum and the International Energy Authority. ” Kevin Hester

“Chris Field is the founding director of the Carnegie Institution’s department of global ecology and professor for interdisciplinary environmental studies at Stanford University. He is the co-chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) working group two (WGII) and US nominee for the chair of the IPCC.”
With people like this driving the IPCC you can see why we are all done for.” Kevin Hester.

There is No Carbon Budget

California emitted 459 Toxic Tons of Carbon Dioxide in 2014.

Gov Browns call to reduce this to 1990 levels so we can continue to emit over 400 million Toxic Tons a year, will not help us stop or slow down Global Warming and Sea Levels Rising.

“Updates to the 2020 Limit.
Calculation of the original 1990 limit approved in 2007 was revised using the scientifically updated IPCC 2007 fourth assessment report (AR4) global warming potentials, to 431 MMTCO2e. Thus the 2020 GHG emissions limit established in response to AB 32 is now slightly higher than the 427 MMTCO2e in the initial Scoping Plan.” Ca. Gov. Data

What will the Temp. be at 415 ppm ?

“Ice sheets contain enormous quantities of frozen water. If the Greenland Ice Sheet melted, scientists estimate that sea level would rise about 6 meters (20 feet). If the Antarctic Ice Sheet melted, sea level would rise by about 60 meters (200 feet).” National Snow and Ice Data Center.

When will Sea Level Rise to 220 – 300 Feet ? 2020 ? 2025 ? ?

What will the ppm of Carbon be when this happens ?

As of Now, they are talking about capping GHGs at 450 ppm.

What will the Temp. be at 450 ppm ?

We must transition to 100% Renewable Energy

Implement a California Residential and Commercial Feed in Tariff.

California Residential Feed in Tariff would allow homeowners to sell their Renewable Energy to the utility, protecting our communities from, Global Warming, Poison Water, Grid Failures, Natural Disasters, Toxic Natural Gas and Oil Fracking.

A California Commercial FiT in Los Angeles, Palo Alto, an Sacramento Ca. are operating NOW, paying the Business Person 17 cents cents per kilowatt hour.

Sign and Share this petition for a California Residential Feed in Tariff.
http://signon.org/sign/let-california-home-owners

What does this even mean? How could this UN official — how could anyone in the developed world — not have seen capitalism work?

And the comment from Dan Mitchell has nothing to do with that first sentence in the blog paragraph I quoted.

See: http://mynutzandboltz.blogspot.com/2015/02/un-admits-climate-cange-is-ruse-to.html

The plain fact is that capitalism as practiced is not working as intended. By rejecting sustainablity in favor of unlimited material growth, it dooms itself; and by refusing to account for negative externalities like pollution, it passes the costs of dealing with that pollution on to government — giving us the corporate form of that socialism so many business bigwigs love to blame for all ills.

In other words, the authors of that paper manipulated data to give them a desired conclusion contrary to the scientific consensus.

Color me unsurprised. If they had any data that honestly contradicted the consensus, we would all have heard about it from the scientific establishment, and those authors would all be rolling in money.

That in itself is meaningless. It could be good; locally the homeschooling movement is dreadful, driven by fundamentalist christians (so no real science – which seems to be your point of view). The biggest problem we have in our math/stat classes for many of them who come to our university is that they lack the background needed to generalize: they perform well on work that is just like the texts’ problems, but they perform less well than the general student body on problems where some slight modification is needed.

Garrett Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons”, who didn’t read that 40 years ago? Of course you were just babies them, or not yet born.

What I would suggest to some of you, people who are adventurous enough to take on the extreme challenge of raising children, is, don’t follow your parents’ footsteps of both parents’ working to have a “better life”, and then sending their kids (you) to mass-indoctrination centers called schools. Life is about interpersonal relationships. One adult leading classes of 20 “other people’s kids” is a monstrosity.

Your parents chose it because they experienced it, and it was “convenient” to making more money. Eewe.

Move to a place where one parent has to “bring hoe the bacon,” and the other can stay at home, and give intensive one-on-one or one-on-two upbringing. Just because your own parents f’d you doesn’t mean you have to do it to your children.

Try something different. If you keep your children at home, you will realize a new dimension of life.

We visited Grand Teton and Yellowstone NP a few years ago in late September. There were a fair number of children. They were all “homeschooled”.

Eewe! When did your parents take you to Grand Teton/Yellowsone in fall?

But it isn’t just the U.S. Canada, UK, France, Finland, communist China, Cuba, Russia, try to take your kids on vacation at any time of the year when school is in session. Good luck!

Do you doubt that human induced global warming is real? Are you defending the anti-science position? What is your point? We’ve known about the insulating effect of the atmosphere since the early 1800’s. We’ve know about the ability of carbon dioxide to block infrared since the mid 1800’s. We also know about the corrupting effect of fossil fuel money on our political process. If you want to point fingers at somebody, why not point them at the “polluticians” and businessmen who continually savage climate science in the interest of fossil fuel money.
Have a nice day.

This is a non sequitur. Humans are usually tethered by property, jobs, schools, and geographically limited social relationships. Many of us adapt to high temperatures with air-conditioning.

Plants and animals are already migrating toward the poles and to higher altitudes.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/05/climate-change-pushing-marine-species-to-poles
http://phys.org/news/2013-08-ucsb-climate-modifications-marine-life.html
.
http://e360.yale.edu/feature/at_edge_of_peruvian_andes_tracking_impacts_of_warming/2
570/