<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Research Demonstrates Link Between Greenhouse Gas Pollution and Global Warming	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Science Denialists Have Delayed Action On Climate Change: Soon vs. the Hockey Stick &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475887</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Science Denialists Have Delayed Action On Climate Change: Soon vs. the Hockey Stick &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] New Research Demonstrates Link Between Greenhouse Gas Pollution and Global Warming [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] New Research Demonstrates Link Between Greenhouse Gas Pollution and Global Warming [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Highlights of Climate Change Research in 2015 &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Highlights of Climate Change Research in 2015 &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 03&#8211;01 New Research Demonstrates Link Between Greenhouse Gas Pollution and Global Warming [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 03&#8211;01 New Research Demonstrates Link Between Greenhouse Gas Pollution and Global Warming [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A Global Warming Fingerprint Confirmed: Upper Troposphere Warming &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Global Warming Fingerprint Confirmed: Upper Troposphere Warming &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 15:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] warming is real, and caused by the release of human generated greenhouse gas pollution. We can measure the greenhouse gas concentrations (mainly CO2) and we can measure surface warming and upper ocean warming. But global warming should [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] warming is real, and caused by the release of human generated greenhouse gas pollution. We can measure the greenhouse gas concentrations (mainly CO2) and we can measure surface warming and upper ocean warming. But global warming should [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andre Kolver		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre Kolver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In essence the greenhouse effect is the main cause for global warming and although we are trying to decrease our carbon footprint I feel more can be done. People should understand the greenhouse effect properly and should also be informed on how to decrease their carbon footprint. Global warming is becoming a serious problem and should be considered as a threat.
15099483]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In essence the greenhouse effect is the main cause for global warming and although we are trying to decrease our carbon footprint I feel more can be done. People should understand the greenhouse effect properly and should also be informed on how to decrease their carbon footprint. Global warming is becoming a serious problem and should be considered as a threat.<br />
15099483</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GregH		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But that&#039;s to be expected of &lt;I&gt;Forbes&lt;/i&gt;.  They&#039;re market fundamentalists, and believe that Neoliberal economics is the solution to all the world&#039;s problems.  In a modern democracy, we can&#039;t stop them from believing in nonsense, but the challenge is to figure out how to convince people to stop taking them seriously.  Their schtick boils down to, &quot;You want to get rich, don&#039;t you? Therefore regulation is bad!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that&#8217;s to be expected of <i>Forbes</i>.  They&#8217;re market fundamentalists, and believe that Neoliberal economics is the solution to all the world&#8217;s problems.  In a modern democracy, we can&#8217;t stop them from believing in nonsense, but the challenge is to figure out how to convince people to stop taking them seriously.  Their schtick boils down to, &#8220;You want to get rich, don&#8217;t you? Therefore regulation is bad!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another even-I-can-understand-it description:

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/02/25/co2-greenhouse-effect-increase/ 

Re. denialism:

This past weekend a post on Jim Milks&#039; blog 

http://environmentalforest.blogspot.dk/2015/02/james-taylor-has-no-idea-what-hes.html 

made me aware of these two James Taylor articles in Forbes: 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/02/25/cold-and-snow-destroy-global-warming-claims/ 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2014/04/30/twenty-years-of-winter-cooling-defy-global-warming-claims/ 

The first article purports to disprove global warming by focusing on winter in a limited part of the U.S. The second claims a winter cooling trend going back to 1930:

“As U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) data show, The Weather Channel and Climate Central engaged in deceptive and unscrupulous cherry-picking to mislead readers into thinking a long-term cooling trend was actually a long-term warming trend. The NOAA data referenced and linked above show winter temperatures have been cooling for the past 20 years. U.S. Historical Climatology Network data show the cooling trend extends back even further, all the way to 1930. Nevertheless, The Weather Channel and Climate Central deliberately chose an outlier year, 40-plus years ago (1970), with a winter much cooler than other years immediately before and after, and compared it to a recent outlier year (2012) with a winter that was much warmer than other years immediately before and after.
As the NOAA and USHCN data show, almost any way you slice and dice the data, the United States is in a long-term winter cooling trend. The period 1930-2014 shows cooling. The period 1995-2014 shows cooling. The long-term trend line from just about any other year to the present shows cooling. Nevertheless, a very few data points can be cherry-picked to give the illusion of winter warming, so that’s just what The Weather Channel and Climate Central did.”

“ U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) data show” links to Steve Goddard&#039;s blog, not to a reliable data source. Not only does Taylor turn a long-term warming trend into a cooling trend, but he then accuses others of using the cherry picking tactics that his own distortions are based on. 

I agree with Greg that the tide has changed. I would also add that the evidence – both theoretical and empirical – in support of anthropogenic climate change is so conclusive, that&lt;i&gt; honest&lt;/i&gt;* denial is no longer possible.

*I recognize that some septics are so abysmally stupid that a term like honest is irrelevant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another even-I-can-understand-it description:</p>
<p><a href="http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/02/25/co2-greenhouse-effect-increase/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/02/25/co2-greenhouse-effect-increase/</a> </p>
<p>Re. denialism:</p>
<p>This past weekend a post on Jim Milks&#8217; blog </p>
<p><a href="http://environmentalforest.blogspot.dk/2015/02/james-taylor-has-no-idea-what-hes.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://environmentalforest.blogspot.dk/2015/02/james-taylor-has-no-idea-what-hes.html</a> </p>
<p>made me aware of these two James Taylor articles in Forbes: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/02/25/cold-and-snow-destroy-global-warming-claims/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/02/25/cold-and-snow-destroy-global-warming-claims/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2014/04/30/twenty-years-of-winter-cooling-defy-global-warming-claims/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2014/04/30/twenty-years-of-winter-cooling-defy-global-warming-claims/</a> </p>
<p>The first article purports to disprove global warming by focusing on winter in a limited part of the U.S. The second claims a winter cooling trend going back to 1930:</p>
<p>“As U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) data show, The Weather Channel and Climate Central engaged in deceptive and unscrupulous cherry-picking to mislead readers into thinking a long-term cooling trend was actually a long-term warming trend. The NOAA data referenced and linked above show winter temperatures have been cooling for the past 20 years. U.S. Historical Climatology Network data show the cooling trend extends back even further, all the way to 1930. Nevertheless, The Weather Channel and Climate Central deliberately chose an outlier year, 40-plus years ago (1970), with a winter much cooler than other years immediately before and after, and compared it to a recent outlier year (2012) with a winter that was much warmer than other years immediately before and after.<br />
As the NOAA and USHCN data show, almost any way you slice and dice the data, the United States is in a long-term winter cooling trend. The period 1930-2014 shows cooling. The period 1995-2014 shows cooling. The long-term trend line from just about any other year to the present shows cooling. Nevertheless, a very few data points can be cherry-picked to give the illusion of winter warming, so that’s just what The Weather Channel and Climate Central did.”</p>
<p>“ U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) data show” links to Steve Goddard&#8217;s blog, not to a reliable data source. Not only does Taylor turn a long-term warming trend into a cooling trend, but he then accuses others of using the cherry picking tactics that his own distortions are based on. </p>
<p>I agree with Greg that the tide has changed. I would also add that the evidence – both theoretical and empirical – in support of anthropogenic climate change is so conclusive, that<i> honest</i>* denial is no longer possible.</p>
<p>*I recognize that some septics are so abysmally stupid that a term like honest is irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Student of University of Pretoria (15017339)		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Student of University of Pretoria (15017339)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is essential that people realise and fully understand how the greenhouse effect has impacted our planet. Therefore, it&#039;s a great acheivement towards society when people admit this and then it can lead to active participation to help &#039;heal&#039; our planet (even if it means really slowly).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is essential that people realise and fully understand how the greenhouse effect has impacted our planet. Therefore, it&#8217;s a great acheivement towards society when people admit this and then it can lead to active participation to help &#8216;heal&#8217; our planet (even if it means really slowly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[0.2 W ^m?2 per decade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0.2 W ^m?2 per decade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/03/01/linking-co2-to-global-warming/#comment-475879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20931#comment-475879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the current anomalous value for watts per square meter? I suppose I could go read the paper....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the current anomalous value for watts per square meter? I suppose I could go read the paper&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
