<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Climate Science vs. Climate Science Denial in Word Clouds	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/17/climate-scientists-vs-climate-science-deniers-in-word-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/17/climate-scientists-vs-climate-science-deniers-in-word-clouds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Science vs Denial in Word Clouds &#124; Climate Denial Crock of the Week		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/17/climate-scientists-vs-climate-science-deniers-in-word-clouds/#comment-475661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Science vs Denial in Word Clouds &#124; Climate Denial Crock of the Week]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20901#comment-475661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Greg Laden&#8217;s Blog: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Greg Laden&#8217;s Blog: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chakat Firepaw		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/17/climate-scientists-vs-climate-science-deniers-in-word-clouds/#comment-475660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chakat Firepaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20901#comment-475660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A word cloud takes the words used in some source and scales them based on how common they are, (commonly removing words like &quot;the&quot; and &quot;and&quot;).  It creates a visual way of seeing what the person/people creating the content talk about a lot.

It&#039;s similar to the tag cloud Greg has on the sidebar:  He tags many posts with things like &quot;Climate Change&quot; and &quot;Charles Darwin&quot; and comparatively few with &quot;cats&quot; and &quot;diet&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A word cloud takes the words used in some source and scales them based on how common they are, (commonly removing words like &#8220;the&#8221; and &#8220;and&#8221;).  It creates a visual way of seeing what the person/people creating the content talk about a lot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s similar to the tag cloud Greg has on the sidebar:  He tags many posts with things like &#8220;Climate Change&#8221; and &#8220;Charles Darwin&#8221; and comparatively few with &#8220;cats&#8221; and &#8220;diet&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/17/climate-scientists-vs-climate-science-deniers-in-word-clouds/#comment-475659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20901#comment-475659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting. I&#039;ve no idea what a word cloud is. Deniers of the evidence for human-caused climate change work hard to mask why the deny the evidence, citing bogus reasons and in my experience *NEVER* citing the actual reasons except by accident. In Usenet I have seen deniers accidentally admit they reject the evidence out of religious &quot;my god(s) wouldn&#039;t let it happen&quot; beliefs, usually the Christian gods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;ve no idea what a word cloud is. Deniers of the evidence for human-caused climate change work hard to mask why the deny the evidence, citing bogus reasons and in my experience *NEVER* citing the actual reasons except by accident. In Usenet I have seen deniers accidentally admit they reject the evidence out of religious &#8220;my god(s) wouldn&#8217;t let it happen&#8221; beliefs, usually the Christian gods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
