<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Media, klimaforskning og moralsk argumentasjon &#8211; politiskfilosofi.no		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media, klimaforskning og moralsk argumentasjon &#8211; politiskfilosofi.no]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Ladens innlegg på Scienceblogs er mye bedre. Han tar utgangspunkt i en artikkel Lomborg skrev i The Wall Street Journal. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ladens innlegg på Scienceblogs er mye bedre. Han tar utgangspunkt i en artikkel Lomborg skrev i The Wall Street Journal. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475425&quot;&gt;Jimmy&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Global warming is a scam…. Time will show that fact…&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

And even 93% of the world&#039;s ice masses are in on the conspiracy! Damn them!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475425">Jimmy</a>.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;Global warming is a scam…. Time will show that fact…&#8221;</b></p>
<p>And even 93% of the world&#8217;s ice masses are in on the conspiracy! Damn them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jimmy		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Global warming is a scam.... Time will show that fact... By then the left will just rename it again.... &quot;The sky is falling!!!&quot; Lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is a scam&#8230;. Time will show that fact&#8230; By then the left will just rename it again&#8230;. &#8220;The sky is falling!!!&#8221; Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bjorn Lomborg Pulled From Australian Consensus Centre Project &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bjorn Lomborg Pulled From Australian Consensus Centre Project &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 14:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Australian Government funds $4 million sweet deal for #climate contrarian Bjorn Lomborg &#8211; @Takvera		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Australian Government funds $4 million sweet deal for #climate contrarian Bjorn Lomborg &#8211; @Takvera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Mr Lomborg was given short shrift at Greg Laden&#8217;s March, 2015 blog: Bjorn Lomborg Is Wrong About Bangladesh And Sea Level Rise. He didn&#8217;t fair any better in a Greg Laden blog from February, 2015, either, attacking him on general climate science: Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Mr Lomborg was given short shrift at Greg Laden&#8217;s March, 2015 blog: Bjorn Lomborg Is Wrong About Bangladesh And Sea Level Rise. He didn&#8217;t fair any better in a Greg Laden blog from February, 2015, either, attacking him on general climate science: Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bjorn Lomborg Is Wrong About Bangladesh And Sea Level Rise &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bjorn Lomborg Is Wrong About Bangladesh And Sea Level Rise &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I’ve noted this before (see: Are electric cars any good? Lomborg says no, but he’s wrong. and Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong). Climate Hawks critiques Lomborg’s Bangladesh strategy here noting issues I did not cover above. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I’ve noted this before (see: Are electric cars any good? Lomborg says no, but he’s wrong. and Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong). Climate Hawks critiques Lomborg’s Bangladesh strategy here noting issues I did not cover above. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just stay away from the Antarctic, you&#039;ll be fine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stay away from the Antarctic, you&#8217;ll be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Daniel Bastian #31 says,
&lt;blockquote&gt;The warmer surface under the ice shelves cause the ice shelves to lose mass, thus freshening the surrounding ocean and raising the freezing point of the water, which allows sea ice to form more easily&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Annnd ice is a good thermal insulator.  Annnd, as far as I know, enhanced albido in the higher latitudes does not balance excess solar input in more equitorial regions (even though it is not showing up as increased thermal expansion or warming the top of the troposphere). But wait, there is more: Extra sea ice should be a &#039;positive feedback&#039; to GHG warming.

Because of anthropogenic global warming, we are all going to freeze to death.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Bastian #31 says,</p>
<blockquote><p>The warmer surface under the ice shelves cause the ice shelves to lose mass, thus freshening the surrounding ocean and raising the freezing point of the water, which allows sea ice to form more easily</p></blockquote>
<p>Annnd ice is a good thermal insulator.  Annnd, as far as I know, enhanced albido in the higher latitudes does not balance excess solar input in more equitorial regions (even though it is not showing up as increased thermal expansion or warming the top of the troposphere). But wait, there is more: Extra sea ice should be a &#8216;positive feedback&#8217; to GHG warming.</p>
<p>Because of anthropogenic global warming, we are all going to freeze to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Andrews		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475419</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My first introduction to Lomberg was when he stepped squarely into my area of expertise with some of his chapters in The Skeptical Environmentalist. Various excerpts were shown around the biology department, and the consensus was that he had to be knowingly lying because no-one could get so many things that badly wrong by accident. I used parts of one chapter as an exercise for my students. I told them they needed to confirm his claims, and they came back to the next class with the claims dismantled....they also were quite surprised he would make claims that were so easy to refute. 

I see someone has already posted the Lomberg error website...worth skimming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first introduction to Lomberg was when he stepped squarely into my area of expertise with some of his chapters in The Skeptical Environmentalist. Various excerpts were shown around the biology department, and the consensus was that he had to be knowingly lying because no-one could get so many things that badly wrong by accident. I used parts of one chapter as an exercise for my students. I told them they needed to confirm his claims, and they came back to the next class with the claims dismantled&#8230;.they also were quite surprised he would make claims that were so easy to refute. </p>
<p>I see someone has already posted the Lomberg error website&#8230;worth skimming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Mashey		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/02/03/bjorn-lomborg-did-not-get-facts-straight/#comment-475418</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mashey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20867#comment-475418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Christopher:
Thanks, that one was supposed to be link to Lubos Motl&#039;s post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher:<br />
Thanks, that one was supposed to be link to Lubos Motl&#8217;s post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
