<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NOAA Paraguay Data Accusation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/#comment-475094</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20826#comment-475094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another reason for Greg to be a proud Minnesotan:

&quot;That&#039;s how it happened. It&#039;s thanks to Michele Bachmann.&quot;

(The gift that keeps on giving.)

A new fact check site has been established that deals specifically with misleading science claims.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/02/michele-bachmann-factcheck-scicheck-inquiring-minds 

http://www.factcheck.org/scicheck/ 

Of relevance here is this debunking:

Nothing False About Temperature Data
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/ 

The scicheck site covers more than climate change, but it seems like a worthy addition to one of Greg&#039;s other search engines.

(Dana Nuccitelli has written a book comparing the track record of consensus and climate-change-is-nothing-to-worry-about scientists. The Michele Bachmann inspiration reminded me that God, too, has a track record. Last time Bachmann, Perry, and Romney all consulted with God before announcing their candidacies. If a human had a corresponding track record, no one would trust him. And now Scott Walker is seeking God&#039;s guidance. I see that as a very good sign.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason for Greg to be a proud Minnesotan:</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s how it happened. It&#8217;s thanks to Michele Bachmann.&#8221;</p>
<p>(The gift that keeps on giving.)</p>
<p>A new fact check site has been established that deals specifically with misleading science claims.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/02/michele-bachmann-factcheck-scicheck-inquiring-minds" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/02/michele-bachmann-factcheck-scicheck-inquiring-minds</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.factcheck.org/scicheck/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.factcheck.org/scicheck/</a> </p>
<p>Of relevance here is this debunking:</p>
<p>Nothing False About Temperature Data<br />
<a href="http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/</a> </p>
<p>The scicheck site covers more than climate change, but it seems like a worthy addition to one of Greg&#8217;s other search engines.</p>
<p>(Dana Nuccitelli has written a book comparing the track record of consensus and climate-change-is-nothing-to-worry-about scientists. The Michele Bachmann inspiration reminded me that God, too, has a track record. Last time Bachmann, Perry, and Romney all consulted with God before announcing their candidacies. If a human had a corresponding track record, no one would trust him. And now Scott Walker is seeking God&#8217;s guidance. I see that as a very good sign.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete A		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/#comment-475093</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20826#comment-475093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker" rel="nofollow ugc">http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kereng		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/#comment-475092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kereng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20826#comment-475092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The deniers cherry-pick stations where the adjustments result in rising temperatures. I would like to show them counterexamples where the raw data were rising too fast and had to be calibrated down. Where can I find some?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deniers cherry-pick stations where the adjustments result in rising temperatures. I would like to show them counterexamples where the raw data were rising too fast and had to be calibrated down. Where can I find some?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/#comment-475091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20826#comment-475091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[He would probably claim that this video had been tampered with...

(Does the man not realize that it&#039;s HIS own brain that has been tampered with???)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He would probably claim that this video had been tampered with&#8230;</p>
<p>(Does the man not realize that it&#8217;s HIS own brain that has been tampered with???)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GregH		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/#comment-475090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20826#comment-475090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Marco, you&#039;re probably right, but it would be amusing to watch Booker seeing it once.  For real entertainment, someone should make a video of the Telegraph&#039;s editorial board watching it one or more times.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marco, you&#8217;re probably right, but it would be amusing to watch Booker seeing it once.  For real entertainment, someone should make a video of the Telegraph&#8217;s editorial board watching it one or more times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marco		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/01/26/noaa-paraguay-data-accusation/#comment-475089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20826#comment-475089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you can show this video to Booker 5 million times and he still won&#039;t get it. In fact, it will just make him believe his own story even more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you can show this video to Booker 5 million times and he still won&#8217;t get it. In fact, it will just make him believe his own story even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
