<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Global Warming Means More Lightning	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/11/14/global-warming-means-more-lightning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/11/14/global-warming-means-more-lightning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:52:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erayor		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/11/14/global-warming-means-more-lightning/#comment-484417</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erayor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20633#comment-484417</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;...explains 77% of the variance...&quot;

Variance is real and part of the purest science (for you science deniers : it&#039;s called mathematics).
To be clear: if you have observational data, you don&#039;t need to apply them to any models (data is real, it&#039;s really not that difficult, just basic graduate science like science deniers say).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;explains 77% of the variance&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Variance is real and part of the purest science (for you science deniers : it&#8217;s called mathematics).<br />
To be clear: if you have observational data, you don&#8217;t need to apply them to any models (data is real, it&#8217;s really not that difficult, just basic graduate science like science deniers say).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hank Roberts		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/11/14/global-warming-means-more-lightning/#comment-484416</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hank Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20633#comment-484416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How does lightning rate correlate with hailstone formation, any idea?  I&#039;d guess that higher convection energy means
-- more potential nuclei for hailstone formation are carried up high, maybe more hailstones forming, and
-- more lift available, so possibly more up and down cycles before hailstones get heavy enough to fall out.

As I recall, convective cycling is what builds up the size of hailstones.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-11/msu-rms111414.php]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does lightning rate correlate with hailstone formation, any idea?  I&#8217;d guess that higher convection energy means<br />
&#8212; more potential nuclei for hailstone formation are carried up high, maybe more hailstones forming, and<br />
&#8212; more lift available, so possibly more up and down cycles before hailstones get heavy enough to fall out.</p>
<p>As I recall, convective cycling is what builds up the size of hailstones.<br />
<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-11/msu-rms111414.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-11/msu-rms111414.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
