Real science isn’t “settled”, but evolves as it reveals reality. Real scientists question the accepted orthodoxy and try and prove it wrong. Most of the deniers’ “climate science” I read about is based on bogus hypotheses of CAGW charlatans. Without this, where are you?

Whatever Mark Steyn said about Michael Mann will be settled in court, where adults go and use their real names, and stand behind their statements.

When all is said and done, will the church of climate denierology shift back to yet another hairbrained “theory”, espoused just last week, if that’s where the denier donation money is? I’m betting yes.

The minute she began to question the ideology and to consider that the prevailing ideology/(lack of)wisdom is wrong, you Warmunists toss her to the curb and then lift your leg on her.

You’re a loser, Eco-Leftist.

Laden’s post here could be construed as rather misleading.

The tweet that Curry liked or favorited or whatever was to a post containing the material in a blurb about Laden and Mann. However, it also contained a sizeable blurb specifically dedicated to Curry and her dispute with Mann.

I would suspect it was THAT material at the link Curry was specifically favoriting. And, Laden, being a smart guy, would probably suspect this too. However, giving Curry a fair reading would result in the loss of an opportunity to break out the fainting couch and demand an apology.

Additionally, I’ve read Steyn for years. I have never seen him write ONE WORD on the “men’s rights” movement. He has his hobby horses – global warming alarmism, muslim extremism, the regulatory state, government over-reach, demographics, and fiscal irresponsibility, but “men’s rights” is no where on the list – at least as “men’s rights” is commonly understood. Googling “Mark Steyn and men’s rights” turned up zero hits for this, nor did “mark steyn and father’s rights”. At least on the first page.

Nor have I ever heard him reference “slyme pit” before. And googling Mark Steyn and slyme pit” or “mark steyn and slymepit” has this blog post, or others linking it, as three of the top four links, with the fourth being a comment on a page made by a reader containing a reference to Mark Steyn. I didn’t see any type of direct listing of Steyn with Slyme Pit.

One would think that the blogger’s actions here (making a gross misrepresentation of someone’s actions, while peppering in some misleading cat nip for his readers) would cause some of his staunchest defenders to look again at defending him. The world, and our causes, would be better served by not equating defending our allies with defending our causes.

Okay.

Anyway, let us know when you have something of substance to contribute.

You have apparently wandered into the wrong room. This is a science site. No doubt there are numerous “fucking ass kicking” sites you can visit where you’ll be in your element.

I am not your regular troll.

You certainly seem to be.

Time to move on and consign the Luddites and vandals to the trash can of history. We have work to do.