<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Near Earth Object Will Be Near Earth	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 01:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: What Would Happen If That Asteroid Were To Hit Earth On Sunday? &#187; Gossips		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/#comment-481739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What Would Happen If That Asteroid Were To Hit Earth On Sunday? &#187; Gossips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 01:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20257#comment-481739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Near Earth Object Will Be Near Earth  [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Near Earth Object Will Be Near Earth  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/#comment-481738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20257#comment-481738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://planetary.org/explore/projects/laser-bees/Gibbings-Laser-Bees-201202.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetary.org/explore/projects/laser-bees/Gibbings-Laser-Bees-201202.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://planetary.org/explore/projects/laser-bees/Gibbings-Laser-Bees-201202.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/#comment-481737</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20257#comment-481737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dayum, Greg... apologies about the &#039;already know&#039;.  I thought I was responding to Orac&#039;s walls-o-tripe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dayum, Greg&#8230; apologies about the &#8216;already know&#8217;.  I thought I was responding to Orac&#8217;s walls-o-tripe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/#comment-481736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20257#comment-481736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, early detection is the thing.  However, If one gets lucky and the asteroid is of  &#039;rubble pile&#039; nature AND rotating then it may be possible to just &#039;blow it up&#039; and let the centripital acceleration scatter it to the 4, um, ... , it flies apart.

Otherwise, *ablation* with nukes is preffered wherein nukes are detonated ahead of the asteroid, heating the surface to offgass and deflect trajectory (velocity).  There are many other schemes, such as gravity &#039;tractors&#039; but that takes time. Think *Apophis* 2004 MN4, aka 99942.

Of course, the same idea that can deflect such things can redirect them for malice.

(no links, nobody here reads them anyways cause ya&#039;ll already know...)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, early detection is the thing.  However, If one gets lucky and the asteroid is of  &#8216;rubble pile&#8217; nature AND rotating then it may be possible to just &#8216;blow it up&#8217; and let the centripital acceleration scatter it to the 4, um, &#8230; , it flies apart.</p>
<p>Otherwise, *ablation* with nukes is preffered wherein nukes are detonated ahead of the asteroid, heating the surface to offgass and deflect trajectory (velocity).  There are many other schemes, such as gravity &#8216;tractors&#8217; but that takes time. Think *Apophis* 2004 MN4, aka 99942.</p>
<p>Of course, the same idea that can deflect such things can redirect them for malice.</p>
<p>(no links, nobody here reads them anyways cause ya&#8217;ll already know&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SmarterThanYourAverageBear		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/#comment-481735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SmarterThanYourAverageBear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20257#comment-481735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All else being equal, damage will also depend on the meteorite&#039;s composition. Carbonaceous chondrites can contain high percentages (up to 22%) water as well as organic material. Some others are just rock piles that break up immediately in the atmosphere, while others are solid nickel-iron which means greater mass per volume so more energy potential.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All else being equal, damage will also depend on the meteorite&#8217;s composition. Carbonaceous chondrites can contain high percentages (up to 22%) water as well as organic material. Some others are just rock piles that break up immediately in the atmosphere, while others are solid nickel-iron which means greater mass per volume so more energy potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/09/05/near-earth-object-will-be-near-earth/#comment-481734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=20257#comment-481734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not so much &quot;over Russia&quot; as &quot;INTO Russia&quot;, Greg!  (It *is* their airspace, and fragments did reach the ground...)

And you forgot Tunguska, if you want to consider &quot;what if&quot; impacts that relate to actual, documented events...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so much &#8220;over Russia&#8221; as &#8220;INTO Russia&#8221;, Greg!  (It *is* their airspace, and fragments did reach the ground&#8230;)</p>
<p>And you forgot Tunguska, if you want to consider &#8220;what if&#8221; impacts that relate to actual, documented events&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
