<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2036 and Climate Change	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/25/2036-and-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/25/2036-and-climate-change/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Week of Global Warming News, March 30, 2014 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/25/2036-and-climate-change/#comment-479406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Week of Global Warming News, March 30, 2014 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19184#comment-479406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 2014/03/25: GLaden: 2036 and Climate Change [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2014/03/25: GLaden: 2036 and Climate Change [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 2014 SkS Weekly Digest #13		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/25/2036-and-climate-change/#comment-479405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2014 SkS Weekly Digest #13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19184#comment-479405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] his blog post, 2036 and Climate Change, Greg Laden uses the graphic of various estimates of climate sensitivity contained in the Advanced [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] his blog post, 2036 and Climate Change, Greg Laden uses the graphic of various estimates of climate sensitivity contained in the Advanced [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/25/2036-and-climate-change/#comment-479404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19184#comment-479404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[catweazle666 is an example of the hubristic, Dunning Kruger incompetence typical of climate septics. S/He triumphantly draws attention to an article that portrays the septics as the destructive morons they are:

&quot;Clive Hamilton, the Australian author of Requiem for a Species, made the essential point a few years ago that climate change denial was no longer just a corporate lobbying campaign. The opponents of science would say what they said unbribed. The movement was in the grip of &quot;cognitive dissonance&quot;, a condition first defined by Leon Festinger and his colleagues in the 1950s . They examined a cult that had attached itself to a Chicago housewife called Dorothy Martin. She convinced her followers to resign from their jobs and sell their possessions because a great flood was to engulf the earth on 21 December 1954. They would be the only survivors. Aliens in a flying saucer would swoop down and save the chosen few.

When 21 December came and went, and the Earth carried on as before, the group did not despair. Martin announced that the aliens had sent her a message saying that they had decided at the last minute not to flood the planet after all. Her followers believed her. They had given up so much for their faith that they would believe anything rather than admit their sacrifices had been pointless.

Climate change deniers are as committed. Their denial fits perfectly with their support for free market economics, opposition to state intervention and hatred of all those latte-slurping, quinoa-munching liberals, with their arrogant manners and dainty hybrid cars, who presume to tell honest men and women how to live. If they admitted they were wrong on climate change, they might have to admit that they were wrong on everything else and their whole political identity would unravel.&quot;
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catweazle666 is an example of the hubristic, Dunning Kruger incompetence typical of climate septics. S/He triumphantly draws attention to an article that portrays the septics as the destructive morons they are:</p>
<p>&#8220;Clive Hamilton, the Australian author of Requiem for a Species, made the essential point a few years ago that climate change denial was no longer just a corporate lobbying campaign. The opponents of science would say what they said unbribed. The movement was in the grip of &#8220;cognitive dissonance&#8221;, a condition first defined by Leon Festinger and his colleagues in the 1950s . They examined a cult that had attached itself to a Chicago housewife called Dorothy Martin. She convinced her followers to resign from their jobs and sell their possessions because a great flood was to engulf the earth on 21 December 1954. They would be the only survivors. Aliens in a flying saucer would swoop down and save the chosen few.</p>
<p>When 21 December came and went, and the Earth carried on as before, the group did not despair. Martin announced that the aliens had sent her a message saying that they had decided at the last minute not to flood the planet after all. Her followers believed her. They had given up so much for their faith that they would believe anything rather than admit their sacrifices had been pointless.</p>
<p>Climate change deniers are as committed. Their denial fits perfectly with their support for free market economics, opposition to state intervention and hatred of all those latte-slurping, quinoa-munching liberals, with their arrogant manners and dainty hybrid cars, who presume to tell honest men and women how to live. If they admitted they were wrong on climate change, they might have to admit that they were wrong on everything else and their whole political identity would unravel.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: catweazle666		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/25/2036-and-climate-change/#comment-479403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catweazle666]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19184#comment-479403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The climate change deniers have won

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The climate change deniers have won</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
