Comments on: Unsure of Climate Science's Predictions? Do it yourself! https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/ Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:40:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: DIY Climate Science Predictions. - myEARTH360 (the blog) https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479300 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:40:12 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479300 […] from scienceblogs.com. Republished with […]

]]> By: Peter https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479299 Sat, 22 Mar 2014 02:02:18 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479299 Anyone have an up-todate graph? Greg?

]]> By: Peter https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479298 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:02:15 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479298 Hi Juice,

Each ‘dot’ along the horizontal axis represents 5 years.

The last coloured bar in the graph is data for 2009.

CO2 certainly rose above 390 ppm in 2011.
The last year the CO2 graph covers is *perhaps* for the year 2009.

Again, it would be good to see a comparative graph utilising up-to-date data…I don’t have the programs though.

My Data:
CO2 is here: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
HadCRUT4 is here: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT4.png

Peter

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479297 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:35:29 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479297 This might address some of the questions.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics/Escalator_2012_500.gif

]]> By: Juice https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479296 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:48:01 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479296 Peter, the graph obviously goes to 2013.

]]> By: See Nick Overlook https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479295 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:11:57 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479295 Speaking of CO2 measurement, should this worry us?http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/03/18/keeling-curve-mauna-loa-carbon-dioxide-scripps/6576803/

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479294 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:46:57 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479294 What do you mean by “pause”?

]]> By: catweazle666 https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479293 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:35:24 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479293 Looks like a bad case of “pause” denial to me.

]]> By: Peter https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479292 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:27:03 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479292 Interesting graph, at first glance the relationship seems to be clear and strong. I note the current level of CO2 is 399.49 ppm [which would place it bang on the top right corner of the graph] however, the temperature/baseline climatic average [if this graph is based on HadCRUT4 data], has remained [from a rough eyeball glance] lower for every subsequent year the graph has not be updated for. Could we see an identical comparative graph that goes to and includes 2013?

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/03/18/unsure-of-climate-sciences-predictions-do-it-yourself/#comment-479291 Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:10:23 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=19156#comment-479291 The blue and red extend above or below a baseline climatic average, and show anomalies, below or above said baseline.

]]>