https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/02/01/nonferrous-mineral-mining-in-minnesota-an-issue-of-science-policy/ Sun, 02 Feb 2014 07:11:45 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/02/01/nonferrous-mineral-mining-in-minnesota-an-issue-of-science-policy/#comment-478220 Sun, 02 Feb 2014 07:11:45 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=18728#comment-478220 They can’t, which is why there are Assrance Funds. But what is the sufficient sum to transfer to those funds?

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/02/01/nonferrous-mineral-mining-in-minnesota-an-issue-of-science-policy/#comment-478219 Sun, 02 Feb 2014 05:00:32 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=18728#comment-478219 How can any company or anyone make guarantees on water filtration for the next 500+ years?

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2014/02/01/nonferrous-mineral-mining-in-minnesota-an-issue-of-science-policy/#comment-478218 Sun, 02 Feb 2014 01:03:13 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=18728#comment-478218 Actually very much to be expected that the deposits would be found, after all if you go to the other side of the complex in the Keweenaw pennisula in MI you found copper (in fact the first copper boom in the US some silver and the like. Since the complex was a result of the attempted tearing apart of North America 1.3 billion years ago one could possibly expect that the deposits might also exist under the sedimentary cover down to Des Monies but would not be currently economic.

]]>