Comments on: I think Bill Nye is great, but I think he's making a mistake.

By: Why Bill Nye needs to stop | ecoroulette

Why Bill Nye needs to stop | ecoroulette — Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:53:23 +0000

[…] out with similar arguments as to the merit (or lack-thereof) of Nye’s arguments (e.g., here, here, and here), so if you’re looking for more convincing […]

By: Bill Nye, Ken Ham, and how science works, part 1 | Science Meets Fiction

Bill Nye, Ken Ham, and how science works, part 1 | Science Meets Fiction — Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:30:59 +0000

[…] the 1970s and 1980s, but have more recently dropped off the radar. Comments made by anthropologist Gred Laden suggest why: he says that scientists should not legitimize the views of creationists by debating […]

By: Use your words | The Official Science Outreach Blog of ASBMB

Use your words | The Official Science Outreach Blog of ASBMB — Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:16:29 +0000

[…] within the scientific community criticized Nye for even participating in the first place, pointing out that he is not an expert on evolution, […]

By: Ham on Nye debate today - Page 16 - Christian Forums

Ham on Nye debate today - Page 16 - Christian Forums — Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:30:58 +0000

[…] […]

By: Greg Laden

Greg Laden — Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:15:51 +0000

I WAZ RONG!!!!

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2014/02/05/who-won-the-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate-bill-nye/

But still, don’t try this at home.

By: Bill Nye Raises Concern in Scientific Community for Debating Creationist | IVN.us

Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:44:22 +0000

[…] and there is absolutely no evidence that gives empirical credibility to creationism. So, as Dr. Greg Laden asked: why […]

By: Leslie

Leslie — Tue, 04 Feb 2014 04:33:17 +0000

Ken Hamm will destroy Mr. Nye in a debate. There are no facts to support evolution. Scientist would have us believe that a mass of nothing existed and out of this mass of nothing life came forth. That is absurd. Every time new artifacts are unearthed they verify the Biblical account of Creation. It takes more faith to believe in evolution than creation. Watch the debate it will be entertaining to watch Ken Hamm disprove evolutionary theories one after another.

By: Sylvester B

Sylvester B — Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:38:36 +0000

Let the debate begin! Creationists have NO scientific evidence to support their case. But, they try. A number of years ago my wife and I drove over to Glen Rose, TX to see the dinosaur tracks in the river. We ran across what was called a “Creationism Museum”, in which they claimed to have uncovered a human footprint superimposed over a dinosaur footprint…both fossilized, of course. They even displayed photographs of this amazing find, which they said had been uncovered in a continuation of the tracks that had been removed and sent to Yale (?) many years ago.

With that kind of evidence, anyone could shoot down their arguments.

BTW, Bill Nye is okay; anyone more qualified would probably present arguments far beyond the ability of most viewers to understand.

JimB

By: Anne B.

Anne B. — Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:32:49 +0000

Creationism is NOT science. Also, no one can prove the existence of God…the Bible is NOT a book of science.

By: Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham: Should scientists bother debating creationists? – Christian Science Monitor | Today Archives

Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:23:23 +0000

[…] “I think Bill Nye is great, but I think he’s making a mistake,” Dr. Laden writes in his blog. ”First, Bill Nye is not really an expert on evolution and is actually not that experienced in debates. Being really really pro science and science education isn’t enough.” […]