Comments on: How does Richard Dawkins corner the Atheist market? https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/ Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:21:36 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489326 Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:21:36 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489326 I think he is mostly right about his views of religion and atheism.

If only “feminist crybabies” care about elevatorgate, then how do you explain the fact that elevatorgate as a thing only exists because it was created by anti-feminist crybabies?

]]> By: beibei https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489325 Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:18:47 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489325 So? Rational thinkers don’t judge people by how mean or privileged they are. He could be the worst person in the world and still be right regarding atheism.

Besides, only feminist crybabies care about Elevatorgate anyway. If you read into it it was really just one woman flipping out over hurt feelings, i.e. nothing.

You have to be careful of these types. Their “atheism” is motivated first and foremost by politics and resentment towards tradition, not an emotionally detached analysis of religion.

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489324 Sun, 20 Oct 2013 01:54:20 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489324 That would be funny.

]]> By: Greg Adams https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489323 Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:02:51 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489323 Minor point: I think the pic should be of Rebecca Watson, not Emma Watson.

]]> By: Serge Dumont https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489322 Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:50:14 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489322 Actually, I doubt this is a correct interpretation of what he said:

http://www.richarddawkins.net/foundation_articles/2013/9/11/child-abuse-a-misunderstanding

Basically he states that HE was not affected to a significant degree by one episode of abuse that lasted 30 secondes. He does not infer that others wouldn’t be under the same circumstances or that victims of repeated offenders would not be traumatised.

Honestly, this Dawkins bashing sound more and more irrational by the minute.

]]> By: Nick Theodorakis https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489321 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:12:59 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489321 Hmm. I broke the link. Here it is:

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/09/richard-dawkins-defends-mild-pedophilia-again-and-again/69269/

]]> By: Nick Theodorakis https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/09/05/how-does-richard-dawkins-corner-the-atheist-market/#comment-489320 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:12:11 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=17654#comment-489320 Dawkins scores another “own goal”:

Richard Dawkins Defends ‘Mild’ Pedophilia, Again and Again .

]]>