<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Look at this tweet by Obama	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/16/look-at-this-tweet-by-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/16/look-at-this-tweet-by-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/16/look-at-this-tweet-by-obama/#comment-487099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16652#comment-487099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think you should make stuff up about what is implied in the tweet and then criticize it!  The vast majority of peer reviewed papers on climate change support AGW as real.  Over 97 percent of the papers published in the field that take any position on the veracity of AGW agree with the concept.  Of the remaining papers, they agree with parts of the concept or oppose it, and over time, that small percentage has dwindled away.  

The president&#039;s tweet is inaccurate: He&#039;s taken  97% of papers to mean 97% of people. Therefore he should be impeached!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you should make stuff up about what is implied in the tweet and then criticize it!  The vast majority of peer reviewed papers on climate change support AGW as real.  Over 97 percent of the papers published in the field that take any position on the veracity of AGW agree with the concept.  Of the remaining papers, they agree with parts of the concept or oppose it, and over time, that small percentage has dwindled away.  </p>
<p>The president&#8217;s tweet is inaccurate: He&#8217;s taken  97% of papers to mean 97% of people. Therefore he should be impeached!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/16/look-at-this-tweet-by-obama/#comment-487098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16652#comment-487098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg, I dont understand, do you support this or what? Clearly this is a misrepresentation of the study. Barack&#039;s statement reads as if all scientists from all fields were surveyed and 97% hold the view that climate change is real, man made, yada yada yada. I personally hold this view (I assume you do too) but come on man, you can&#039;t support bullshit just because you happen to agree with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I dont understand, do you support this or what? Clearly this is a misrepresentation of the study. Barack&#8217;s statement reads as if all scientists from all fields were surveyed and 97% hold the view that climate change is real, man made, yada yada yada. I personally hold this view (I assume you do too) but come on man, you can&#8217;t support bullshit just because you happen to agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: See Nick Overlook		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/16/look-at-this-tweet-by-obama/#comment-487097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[See Nick Overlook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16652#comment-487097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Uh-huh, Barack has said lots of really good stuff over the years.  Still waiting on his Keystone XL pipeline decision.  Bets, anyone?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-huh, Barack has said lots of really good stuff over the years.  Still waiting on his Keystone XL pipeline decision.  Bets, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
