<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Genie Scott: Denialism of Climate Change and Evolution	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/07/genie-scott-denialism-of-climate-change-and-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/07/genie-scott-denialism-of-climate-change-and-evolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Week of Anthropocene Antics, May 12, 2013 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/07/genie-scott-denialism-of-climate-change-and-evolution/#comment-486983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Week of Anthropocene Antics, May 12, 2013 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16559#comment-486983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 2013/05/07: GLaden: Genie Scott: Denialism of Climate Change and Evolution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2013/05/07: GLaden: Genie Scott: Denialism of Climate Change and Evolution [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/05/07/genie-scott-denialism-of-climate-change-and-evolution/#comment-486982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16559#comment-486982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand why she&#039;s so against using denialist as a term.  It&#039;s simply descriptive of their methods.  If they don&#039;t want to be called denialists, they simply have to stop alleging conspiracies, cherry picking data, citing fake experts like Monckton or Behe, moving the goalposts and using logical fallacies.  

Yes, it&#039;s insulting.  But it&#039;s the behavior that carries the negative implication.  No matter what you want to call pseudoscientific bullshit, you&#039;re never going to find a name that adequately sugar-coats it, because it&#039;s simply bad behavior.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why she&#8217;s so against using denialist as a term.  It&#8217;s simply descriptive of their methods.  If they don&#8217;t want to be called denialists, they simply have to stop alleging conspiracies, cherry picking data, citing fake experts like Monckton or Behe, moving the goalposts and using logical fallacies.  </p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s insulting.  But it&#8217;s the behavior that carries the negative implication.  No matter what you want to call pseudoscientific bullshit, you&#8217;re never going to find a name that adequately sugar-coats it, because it&#8217;s simply bad behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
