<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Climate Change Denialism	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 22:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air &#124; Tim Batchelder.com		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486581</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air &#124; Tim Batchelder.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 22:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Climate Change Denialism (scienceblogs.com) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Climate Change Denialism (scienceblogs.com) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Exactly. With this many cooling trends we are practically in an ice age!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. With this many cooling trends we are practically in an ice age!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alsee		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486579</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alsee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing how far some people go massaging the data to fabricate the results they WANT to get. When plotted with SENSIBLE start/endpoints for each epoch you get:

http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1965.0/to:2013.1/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1965.0/to:1977.1/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1977.1/to:1987.0/trend/plot/hadcrut4tr/from:1987.0/to:1996.8/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1996.8/to:2001.0/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001.0/to:2013.0/trend

Anyone who bothers to look at the data in an unbiased way, with sensible start/endpoints, can see the data outright proves global warming doesn&#039;t exist. 1965 to 2013, there&#039;s nothing there but COOLING trends.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how far some people go massaging the data to fabricate the results they WANT to get. When plotted with SENSIBLE start/endpoints for each epoch you get:</p>
<p><a href="http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1965.0/to:2013.1/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1965.0/to:1977.1/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1977.1/to:1987.0/trend/plot/hadcrut4tr/from:1987.0/to:1996.8/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1996.8/to:2001.0/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001.0/to:2013.0/trend" rel="nofollow ugc">http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1965.0/to:2013.1/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1965.0/to:1977.1/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1977.1/to:1987.0/trend/plot/hadcrut4tr/from:1987.0/to:1996.8/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1996.8/to:2001.0/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001.0/to:2013.0/trend</a></p>
<p>Anyone who bothers to look at the data in an unbiased way, with sensible start/endpoints, can see the data outright proves global warming doesn&#8217;t exist. 1965 to 2013, there&#8217;s nothing there but COOLING trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Wiggin		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Wiggin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, I do think your web site could be having internet browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in IE, it&#039;s got some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, excellent site!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I do think your web site could be having internet browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in IE, it&#8217;s got some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, excellent site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Climate scientists face death threats &#124; Tim Batchelder.com		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate scientists face death threats &#124; Tim Batchelder.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 22:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Climate Change Denialism (scienceblogs.com) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Climate Change Denialism (scienceblogs.com) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JMurphy		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMurphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anteaus, please see the post above mine, from Mike M, to which I was replying - using the same time period, but showing the trend. 
What massaging are you suggesting ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anteaus, please see the post above mine, from Mike M, to which I was replying &#8211; using the same time period, but showing the trend.<br />
What massaging are you suggesting ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anteaus		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anteaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JMurphy, I think you are exposing your own wilingness to massage data. When plotted with sensible start/endpoints for each epoch you get:

http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1990/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001/to:2013/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/to:2000/trend

Bear in mind that 1998 was characterised by a very strong El Nino event followed by a rapid cooling, and so should perhaps not be included in trends. Not that this affects the overall pattern. Furthermore it is hard to find any range that doesn&#039;t give a near-flat line post 2001. 

Those are the facts as reported by all of the major climate analyses. Make of them what you will but don&#039;t try to -ahem- deny them. Or massage them away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMurphy, I think you are exposing your own wilingness to massage data. When plotted with sensible start/endpoints for each epoch you get:</p>
<p><a href="http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1990/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001/to:2013/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/to:2000/trend" rel="nofollow ugc">http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1990/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001/to:2013/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/to:2000/trend</a></p>
<p>Bear in mind that 1998 was characterised by a very strong El Nino event followed by a rapid cooling, and so should perhaps not be included in trends. Not that this affects the overall pattern. Furthermore it is hard to find any range that doesn&#8217;t give a near-flat line post 2001. </p>
<p>Those are the facts as reported by all of the major climate analyses. Make of them what you will but don&#8217;t try to -ahem- deny them. Or massage them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anteaus		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anteaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JMurphy, I think you are exposing your own wilingness to massage data. When plotted with sensible start/endpoints for each epoch you get:

http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1990/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001/to:2013/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/to:2000/trend

Bear in mind that 1998 was characterised by a very strong El Nino event followed by a rapid cooling, and so should perhaps not be included in trends. Not that this affects the overall pattern. Furthermore it is hard to find any range that doesn&#039;t give a near-flat line post 2001. 

Those are the facts as reported by all of the major climate analyses. Make of them what you will but don&#039;t try to massage them away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMurphy, I think you are exposing your own wilingness to massage data. When plotted with sensible start/endpoints for each epoch you get:</p>
<p><a href="http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1990/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001/to:2013/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/to:2000/trend" rel="nofollow ugc">http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1990/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2001/to:2013/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/to:2000/trend</a></p>
<p>Bear in mind that 1998 was characterised by a very strong El Nino event followed by a rapid cooling, and so should perhaps not be included in trends. Not that this affects the overall pattern. Furthermore it is hard to find any range that doesn&#8217;t give a near-flat line post 2001. </p>
<p>Those are the facts as reported by all of the major climate analyses. Make of them what you will but don&#8217;t try to massage them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JMurphy		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMurphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike M, here perhaps : 
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/trend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike M, here perhaps :<br />
<a href="http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/trend" rel="nofollow ugc">http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1993/trend</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marc		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/27/climate-change-denialism/#comment-486572</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16190#comment-486572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How can we hate something that gives us so much laughter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we hate something that gives us so much laughter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
