Comments on: The Climate Hockey Stick is Wrong! https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/ Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:10:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 By: The Hockey Stick Graph Was Wrong! | Dave Samojlenko https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486448 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:10:06 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486448 […] From Greg Laden’s Blog: […]

]]> By: J W B https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486447 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:42:35 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486447 Another interesting (and grim) fact about the abundant anthropogenic input of CO2 into our atmosphere is that even if we reduced our CO2 output to 0 today, there will still be a large global increase in temperature. Because the half-life of CO2 follows a negatively exponential scale, there is no possibility of a significant reduction of the atmospheric concentrations of CO2 within the next thousand years. A must-read for those who are interested:
http://forecast.uchicago.edu/Projects/archer.2009.ann_rev_tail.pdf

]]> By: IBI Watch 3/24/13 | IBI Watch https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486446 Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:14:27 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486446 […] Mann, confesses that he was wrong about the concept. But wait until you see what he believes is a more accurate model of the mess we have created for ourselves. And it is always a good time to check where we are on […]

]]> By: pinroot https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486445 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:41:26 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486445 So what is your definition of “good scientific estimates?”

]]> By: Trevor Maunu https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486444 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:25:31 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486444 The scythe would be alot more fitting considering what climate change is doing to the enviroment. Just yesterday I heard there are now hybrid polar/brown bears and narwhal/belugas. Check out my blogs to see some more interesting stuff!
http://trevor-maunu.blogspot.com/
http://trevscienceblog.blogspot.com/

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486443 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:09:45 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486443 Dan: Read the post, not just the title!

]]> By: Dan J Andrews https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486442 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 04:02:33 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486442 –is wishful thinking–

]]> By: Dan J Andrews https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486441 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 04:01:59 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486441 If the graph is flawed there will be peer-reviewed publications showing exactly is wrong with it. At the moment it is confirmed by some other overlaps for part of it. Till something shows up that withstands peer review in journals calling it so flawed as to be completely wrong I wishful thinking.

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486440 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:58:07 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486440 Clifton, the graph does not show 2300, so no. Graph reading is hard, though, this may help:

http://www.studyzone.org/testprep/math4/d/linegraph4l.cfm

The underlying data on which the graph is based were not flawed. The choice of color of the uptick is really not important.

]]> By: Clifton Westin https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/the-climate-hockey-stick-is-wrong/#comment-486439 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:12:54 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16146#comment-486439 Ah, according to the graph, the Earth’s average temperature will be 180F by 2300…sounds legit. (The underlying data used in the graph was found to be flawed, there isn’t a blue uptick like that)

]]>