<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Senate  Vote on Keystone Imminent	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mal Adapted		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mal Adapted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michael Moon:&lt;blockquote&gt;What do you and your readers see as the most compelling and authentic evidence that CO2 changes the climate?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Assuming your interest is sincere, how&#039;s this? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php?p=3&#038;t=146&#038;&#038;a=133&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moon:</p>
<blockquote><p>What do you and your readers see as the most compelling and authentic evidence that CO2 changes the climate?</p></blockquote>
<p>Assuming your interest is sincere, how&#8217;s this? <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php?p=3&amp;t=146&amp;&amp;a=133" rel="nofollow"> How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: elspi		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elspi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What do you and your readers see as the most compelling and authentic evidence that CO2 changes the climate?


Let me see…. 
On the one side we have the national academy of sciences.
(and every other legitimate scientific organization on the face of the planet)

On the other side we have the boys from the Tobacco institute.  

Now the NAS is only right about 97% of the time (since science itself sometimes has it wrong)

The boys from the tobacco institute on the other hand are much more consistent.  They are wrong 100% of the time.  It is literally their business model.   They only weigh in of a subject after it has all been settled.  And they only weigh in to lie their asses off.

We could talk about all the mountains of evidence (literally as far as the geological record of climate), but you already decided to side with the boys from the tobacco institute, so there REALLY IS NO POINT, IS THERE.  

You have your big lie and your “sound science” (which it turns out means science without math) and uncountable many other steaming piles of horseshit, but none of it seems to move the real scientists.  It is, you say, a conspiracy by the scientists.  

And for once in your bullshit life, you are right.  It is a conspiracy by the scientists to expose the lying sacks of shit as lying sacks of shit.  Science has always been exactly that conspiracy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you and your readers see as the most compelling and authentic evidence that CO2 changes the climate?</p>
<p>Let me see….<br />
On the one side we have the national academy of sciences.<br />
(and every other legitimate scientific organization on the face of the planet)</p>
<p>On the other side we have the boys from the Tobacco institute.  </p>
<p>Now the NAS is only right about 97% of the time (since science itself sometimes has it wrong)</p>
<p>The boys from the tobacco institute on the other hand are much more consistent.  They are wrong 100% of the time.  It is literally their business model.   They only weigh in of a subject after it has all been settled.  And they only weigh in to lie their asses off.</p>
<p>We could talk about all the mountains of evidence (literally as far as the geological record of climate), but you already decided to side with the boys from the tobacco institute, so there REALLY IS NO POINT, IS THERE.  </p>
<p>You have your big lie and your “sound science” (which it turns out means science without math) and uncountable many other steaming piles of horseshit, but none of it seems to move the real scientists.  It is, you say, a conspiracy by the scientists.  </p>
<p>And for once in your bullshit life, you are right.  It is a conspiracy by the scientists to expose the lying sacks of shit as lying sacks of shit.  Science has always been exactly that conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: What just happened in the Senate. &#124; Sunset Daily		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486453</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What just happened in the Senate. &#124; Sunset Daily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Senate Vote on Keystone Imminent (scienceblogs.com) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Senate Vote on Keystone Imminent (scienceblogs.com) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why would it work that way?  It is a complex process. Is there some virtue in there being one main piece if evidence? In truth there are dozens of candidates for &quot;most compelling&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would it work that way?  It is a complex process. Is there some virtue in there being one main piece if evidence? In truth there are dozens of candidates for &#8220;most compelling&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Moon		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Moon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please do, just one would satisfy my  curiosity.  One must be the best and most compelling, no?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do, just one would satisfy my  curiosity.  One must be the best and most compelling, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486450</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are so any compelling pieces of evidence that I would be irresponsible to single out one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so any compelling pieces of evidence that I would be irresponsible to single out one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Moon		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/22/senate-vote-on-keystone-imminent/#comment-486449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Moon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16156#comment-486449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg,

Serious, un-loaded, polite question from a skeptic:  What do you and your readers see as the most compelling and authentic evidence that CO2 changes the climate?

I know what I think, I would like to hear what you and your readers think.

Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>Serious, un-loaded, polite question from a skeptic:  What do you and your readers see as the most compelling and authentic evidence that CO2 changes the climate?</p>
<p>I know what I think, I would like to hear what you and your readers think.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
