<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Make $20 and support a good cause at the same time!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/23/make-20-and-support-a-good-cause-at-the-same-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/23/make-20-and-support-a-good-cause-at-the-same-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/23/make-20-and-support-a-good-cause-at-the-same-time/#comment-486139</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=15949#comment-486139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to revise my comment slightly.  One could interpret the statement as advocating a religion over no religion, which has been interpreted by the courts as part of your 1st amendment rights.  I&#039;d still argue that it&#039;s not a particularly forceful &quot;establishment,&quot; though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to revise my comment slightly.  One could interpret the statement as advocating a religion over no religion, which has been interpreted by the courts as part of your 1st amendment rights.  I&#8217;d still argue that it&#8217;s not a particularly forceful &#8220;establishment,&#8221; though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/23/make-20-and-support-a-good-cause-at-the-same-time/#comment-486138</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=15949#comment-486138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For one, I just don&#039;t see the big deal over whether or not our money has a religious statement on it.  It&#039;s also green(ish), has Arabic numerals, pictures, and all manner of things (legal tender for all debts public and private, and what-not).

I really can&#039;t see why anyone would be truly offended by it unless they chose to be offended by it.  I&#039;m personally far more offended by paper money being a permeable carrier of disease and the occasional trace of cocaine.  ;)

Besides, this printed statement in no way prevents your free exercise of religion, and as it does not specify a particular god or deity, or require that you pay homage to a particular god or deity prior to using cash, it is a rather weak argument that those four words constitute an establishment of religion by the government.

Now, if you had to say a prayer, or &quot;God bless!&quot; any time you chose to spend the money, that would be something else.

I just feel that going after small, insignificant things like this make the atheist &quot;cause,&quot; if you will, seem petty and irrational to outside observers (like myself, as I have absolutely no dog in this fight).  Maybe it&#039;s a bigger deal to truer non-believers (wow, that phrase sounds odd).

Please don&#039;t perceive my lack of perception of an offense to be an offense in and of itself.  :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one, I just don&#8217;t see the big deal over whether or not our money has a religious statement on it.  It&#8217;s also green(ish), has Arabic numerals, pictures, and all manner of things (legal tender for all debts public and private, and what-not).</p>
<p>I really can&#8217;t see why anyone would be truly offended by it unless they chose to be offended by it.  I&#8217;m personally far more offended by paper money being a permeable carrier of disease and the occasional trace of cocaine.  😉</p>
<p>Besides, this printed statement in no way prevents your free exercise of religion, and as it does not specify a particular god or deity, or require that you pay homage to a particular god or deity prior to using cash, it is a rather weak argument that those four words constitute an establishment of religion by the government.</p>
<p>Now, if you had to say a prayer, or &#8220;God bless!&#8221; any time you chose to spend the money, that would be something else.</p>
<p>I just feel that going after small, insignificant things like this make the atheist &#8220;cause,&#8221; if you will, seem petty and irrational to outside observers (like myself, as I have absolutely no dog in this fight).  Maybe it&#8217;s a bigger deal to truer non-believers (wow, that phrase sounds odd).</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t perceive my lack of perception of an offense to be an offense in and of itself.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: boba		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/23/make-20-and-support-a-good-cause-at-the-same-time/#comment-486137</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=15949#comment-486137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually we didn&#039;t trust god with our money until 1863, when &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmon_P._Chase&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Salmon P Chase&lt;/a&gt; had it added to the coinage.  And given that coins, particularly silver and gold were the preferred &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specie_Payment_Resumption_Act&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;medium of exchange&lt;/a&gt; its absence from the paper money was not particularly important.And I got a $10 printed in 1950 in change when in Lone Pine CA (coming off the trail).  Still keep it in my trail diary as my &quot;just in case&quot; bill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually we didn&#8217;t trust god with our money until 1863, when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmon_P._Chase" rel="nofollow">Salmon P Chase</a> had it added to the coinage.  And given that coins, particularly silver and gold were the preferred <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specie_Payment_Resumption_Act" rel="nofollow">medium of exchange</a> its absence from the paper money was not particularly important.And I got a $10 printed in 1950 in change when in Lone Pine CA (coming off the trail).  Still keep it in my trail diary as my &#8220;just in case&#8221; bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
