<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Climate Change Denialists Scolded by IPCC	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Week of GW News, December 16, 2012 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496777</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Week of GW News, December 16, 2012 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 2012/12/14: GLaden: Climate Change Denialists Scolded by IPCC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2012/12/14: GLaden: Climate Change Denialists Scolded by IPCC [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Earl Salmony		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Earl Salmony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.nature.com/news/be-persuasive-be-brave-be-arrested-if-necessary-1.11796

Everywhere we look we can find virtual mountains of scientific research with regard to unsustainable pyramid schemes that are surreptitiously foisted upon the human community by a few deceitful people with knowledge at the expense of many too many others who are not ‘in the know’. Those with the most wealth and power buy and pay for the brightest minions and best sycophants who assume responsibilities and perform duties as ‘official’ barbarians at the gate of public awareness. In such a dishonest,unjust and patently unsustainable world order, the only humane response is to take action by doing something that increases awareness of what is sustainable on a planet with the size, limited resources and frangible environs of Earth.
Take what is known to be real about human population dynamics, for example, that gives rise to the human overpopulation of Earth. The growth of the human population worldwide and the global political economy are the two most colossal pyramid schemes on Earth. Where are intellectually honest and morally courageous professionals with appropriate expertise in the biology, economics, ecology, politics and demography who are willing to shed the light provided by the best available science on the relentless overproduction, outrageous overconsumption and unbridled overpopulation activities of the human species: the &quot;mother&quot; of all global threats to future human wellbeing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/be-persuasive-be-brave-be-arrested-if-necessary-1.11796" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nature.com/news/be-persuasive-be-brave-be-arrested-if-necessary-1.11796</a></p>
<p>Everywhere we look we can find virtual mountains of scientific research with regard to unsustainable pyramid schemes that are surreptitiously foisted upon the human community by a few deceitful people with knowledge at the expense of many too many others who are not ‘in the know’. Those with the most wealth and power buy and pay for the brightest minions and best sycophants who assume responsibilities and perform duties as ‘official’ barbarians at the gate of public awareness. In such a dishonest,unjust and patently unsustainable world order, the only humane response is to take action by doing something that increases awareness of what is sustainable on a planet with the size, limited resources and frangible environs of Earth.<br />
Take what is known to be real about human population dynamics, for example, that gives rise to the human overpopulation of Earth. The growth of the human population worldwide and the global political economy are the two most colossal pyramid schemes on Earth. Where are intellectually honest and morally courageous professionals with appropriate expertise in the biology, economics, ecology, politics and demography who are willing to shed the light provided by the best available science on the relentless overproduction, outrageous overconsumption and unbridled overpopulation activities of the human species: the &#8220;mother&#8221; of all global threats to future human wellbeing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Thomerson		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Thomerson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121213142311.htm

This is about the insurance industry take on climate change.  I think this makes climate denialists irrelevant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121213142311.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121213142311.htm</a></p>
<p>This is about the insurance industry take on climate change.  I think this makes climate denialists irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MadScientist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496774</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadScientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re digging up the rotting corpse of the old &quot;magic cosmic rays are responsible for our climate change&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re digging up the rotting corpse of the old &#8220;magic cosmic rays are responsible for our climate change&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course there is, but it does very much highlight the hypocrisy of Watts et al.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course there is, but it does very much highlight the hypocrisy of Watts et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan J. Andrews		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan J. Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m an expert reviewer. Appointed by the IPCC. So I claim. In reality, I signed up to review some of the sections that cross into my field, so I can&#039;t make any such claims. Such is the penalty for belonging to the reality-based community (and having some ethics still not degraded by age and cynicism).

I think his status should be revoked. He got something straight-forward quite backwards. His comments on anything else will be suspect and very likely not worth the time to sift through. Even if he does find something legitimate to comment on, someone else with better reading comprehension would have found it anyway.

The CCSD will find something to whinge about regardless so why not apply the same standards to him as they would to anyone who violated the agreement. No special treatment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an expert reviewer. Appointed by the IPCC. So I claim. In reality, I signed up to review some of the sections that cross into my field, so I can&#8217;t make any such claims. Such is the penalty for belonging to the reality-based community (and having some ethics still not degraded by age and cynicism).</p>
<p>I think his status should be revoked. He got something straight-forward quite backwards. His comments on anything else will be suspect and very likely not worth the time to sift through. Even if he does find something legitimate to comment on, someone else with better reading comprehension would have found it anyway.</p>
<p>The CCSD will find something to whinge about regardless so why not apply the same standards to him as they would to anyone who violated the agreement. No special treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Joel, there  is a huge difference between what  you refer to: Bravely exposing a nefarious plot to interfere with public education and singing an agreement to participate in an honest and open process, cheating, and lying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, there  is a huge difference between what  you refer to: Bravely exposing a nefarious plot to interfere with public education and singing an agreement to participate in an honest and open process, cheating, and lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave X		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496770</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The link to http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/12/13/major-ipcc-report-draft-leaked-then-cherry-picked-climate-sceptics above has a typo in &#039;draft&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/12/13/major-ipcc-report-draft-leaked-then-cherry-picked-climate-sceptics" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/12/13/major-ipcc-report-draft-leaked-then-cherry-picked-climate-sceptics</a> above has a typo in &#8216;draft&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/12/14/climate-change-denialists-scolded-by-ipcc/#comment-496769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=14943#comment-496769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Presumably at some point those who were, quite recently, outraged that someone would have the temerity to obtain documents under false premises and then leak them publicly will decry this sort of behaviour.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably at some point those who were, quite recently, outraged that someone would have the temerity to obtain documents under false premises and then leak them publicly will decry this sort of behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
