<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It&#039;s the Arithmetic, Stupid (Part ii)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/14/its-the-arithmetic-stupid-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/14/its-the-arithmetic-stupid-part-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Last Hussar		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/14/its-the-arithmetic-stupid-part-ii/#comment-494671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Last Hussar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=13429#comment-494671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(the &#039;On&#039; means the odds are effectively reversed - if Obama was 100/30 then a $10 bet would win $33.33)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(the &#8216;On&#8217; means the odds are effectively reversed &#8211; if Obama was 100/30 then a $10 bet would win $33.33)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Last Hussar		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/14/its-the-arithmetic-stupid-part-ii/#comment-494670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Last Hussar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=13429#comment-494670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t look at polls.  Look at Bookmakers.  Polsters don&#039;t lose money if they get it wrong.  A bookie has to get it right to run his business.

Current odds (18-19 Sept)
Obama 100/30 On
Romney 7/2

For those unschooled
If you put $10 on Obama winning you get $3 back (plus the $10 stake- a total of $13)
$10 on Romney gets you $35 (+$10 stake)
The less the payout, the more likely the bookie thinks it will happen.

The bookies think Obama will win.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t look at polls.  Look at Bookmakers.  Polsters don&#8217;t lose money if they get it wrong.  A bookie has to get it right to run his business.</p>
<p>Current odds (18-19 Sept)<br />
Obama 100/30 On<br />
Romney 7/2</p>
<p>For those unschooled<br />
If you put $10 on Obama winning you get $3 back (plus the $10 stake- a total of $13)<br />
$10 on Romney gets you $35 (+$10 stake)<br />
The less the payout, the more likely the bookie thinks it will happen.</p>
<p>The bookies think Obama will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lyle		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/14/its-the-arithmetic-stupid-part-ii/#comment-494669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=13429#comment-494669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Got to keep those eyes on the adds. Recall that is the major purpose of news organizations to get eyes on their adds all else is extra.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to keep those eyes on the adds. Recall that is the major purpose of news organizations to get eyes on their adds all else is extra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
