<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Iran nuclear sites: an animated guide	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: F		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/#comment-491825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/#comment-491825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Almost unique in it&#039;s reference-only delivery. Very nearly weird given the bulk of the news ecosystem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost unique in it&#8217;s reference-only delivery. Very nearly weird given the bulk of the news ecosystem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: itzac		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/#comment-491824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itzac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/#comment-491824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are we certain what they&#039;re after isn&#039;t cold fusion?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we certain what they&#8217;re after isn&#8217;t cold fusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bks		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/#comment-491823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/03/09/iran-nuclear-sites-an-animated/#comment-491823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Iran is close to having a nuclear weapon, and has been since 1984:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
1984: Soon after West German engineers visit the unfinished Bushehr nuclear reactor, Jane&#039;s Defence Weekly quotes West German intelligence sources saying that Iran&#039;s production of a bomb &quot;is entering its final stages.&quot; US Senator Alan Cranston claims Iran is seven years away from making a weapon.
&lt;p&gt;

1992: Israeli parliamentarian Benjamin Netanyahu tells his colleagues that Iran is 3 to 5 years from being able to produce a nuclear weapon - and that the threat had to be &quot;uprooted by an international front headed by the US.&quot;

&lt;p&gt;
1995: The New York Times conveys the fears of senior US and Israeli officials that &quot;Iran is much closer to producing nuclear weapons than previously thought&quot; -about five years away - and that Iran&#039;s nuclear bomb is &quot;at the top of the list&quot; of dangers in the coming decade. The report speaks of an &quot;acceleration of the Iranian nuclear program,&quot; claims that Iran &quot;began an intensive campaign to develop and acquire nuclear weapons&quot; in 1987, and says Iran was &quot;believed&quot; to have recruited scientists from the former Soviet Union and Pakistan to advise them.
...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/422252

    --bks
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran is close to having a nuclear weapon, and has been since 1984:</p>
<blockquote><p>
1984: Soon after West German engineers visit the unfinished Bushehr nuclear reactor, Jane&#8217;s Defence Weekly quotes West German intelligence sources saying that Iran&#8217;s production of a bomb &#8220;is entering its final stages.&#8221; US Senator Alan Cranston claims Iran is seven years away from making a weapon.</p>
<p>1992: Israeli parliamentarian Benjamin Netanyahu tells his colleagues that Iran is 3 to 5 years from being able to produce a nuclear weapon &#8211; and that the threat had to be &#8220;uprooted by an international front headed by the US.&#8221;</p>
<p>
1995: The New York Times conveys the fears of senior US and Israeli officials that &#8220;Iran is much closer to producing nuclear weapons than previously thought&#8221; -about five years away &#8211; and that Iran&#8217;s nuclear bomb is &#8220;at the top of the list&#8221; of dangers in the coming decade. The report speaks of an &#8220;acceleration of the Iranian nuclear program,&#8221; claims that Iran &#8220;began an intensive campaign to develop and acquire nuclear weapons&#8221; in 1987, and says Iran was &#8220;believed&#8221; to have recruited scientists from the former Soviet Union and Pakistan to advise them.<br />
&#8230;
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/422252" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/422252</a></p>
<p>    &#8211;bks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
