Comments on: Darwin was not a biologist (talk) https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:48:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 By: John https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/#comment-491079 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:48:38 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/#comment-491079 🙂 Thanks!

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/#comment-491078 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:03:31 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/#comment-491078 Yeah, I made a graph of Darwin’s ink the other day:

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/charles_darwin_geologist.php

]]> By: John https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/#comment-491077 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:42:05 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/15/darwin-was-not-a-biologist-tal/#comment-491077 Mr. Darwin referred to himself as a geologist in his account of the Beagle voyage, and spilled quite a bit of ink describing his geological observations. Those parts added a great deal to this reader’s enjoyment.

]]>