Comments on: Why did Phobos-Grunt fail? https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:37:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/#comment-490970 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:37:25 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/#comment-490970 So the part of my post where I refer to the Planetary Society, what they say (briefly) and give a link is out of date as well?

Anyway, thanks for the new link. Though it does ultimately provide the same link I provided.

]]> By: Daniel Fischer https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/#comment-490969 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:09:01 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/#comment-490969 Your “better information” is actually nothing but Russian media speculation *before* the report was even released as http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2012/02/space-radiation-killed-russian.html has pointed out (Wired fell into the same trap, BTW) – the Planetary Society author at least read (a rough translation of) the actual report. Whether the latter makes sense, is an entirely different matter, of course …

]]> By: Antonio Mureski https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/#comment-490968 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:05:28 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/02/09/why-did-phobos-grunt-fail/#comment-490968 That’s definitely cosmic rays))
http://batrachospermum.livejournal.com/19237.html

]]>