<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Santorum Wins Chilly Tuesday	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Francisco Bacopa		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francisco Bacopa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;@ ^ Francisco Bacopa : I’m not sure that works on any FTB blog -it doesnt on Pharnygula&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

I thought Google would find the links anywhere and that every link tended to boost the Google ranking. Why would FtB be any different? Or Am I completely mistaken about how this works?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>@ ^ Francisco Bacopa : I’m not sure that works on any FTB blog -it doesnt on Pharnygula</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought Google would find the links anywhere and that every link tended to boost the Google ranking. Why would FtB be any different? Or Am I completely mistaken about how this works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Azkyroth		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azkyroth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Am I a bad person for having this overbearing desire to visit the RNC and lick the tears of unfathomable sadness directly off the faces of their political consultants?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don&#039;t put your mouth on that; you don&#039;t know where it&#039;s been!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Am I a bad person for having this overbearing desire to visit the RNC and lick the tears of unfathomable sadness directly off the faces of their political consultants?</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t put your mouth on that; you don&#8217;t know where it&#8217;s been!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phillip IV		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip IV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Am I a bad person for having this overbearing desire to visit the RNC and lick the tears of unfathomable sadness directly off the faces of their political consultants?

These results are definitely a positive surprise - I mean, on the one hand it&#039;s sad that Santorum is capable of winning anything save for a &quot;most despicable human being&quot; award, but on the other hand the continued, and even intensifying GOP infighting has a definite chance of crippling Romney ahead of his nomination.

Santorum as the nominee, of course, would be the best thing that could happen to Obama, better even than Swingrich - I still think it&#039;s going to be Romney, though, but hopefully in a sufficiently damaged condition.

StevoR @ #3:

&lt;blockquote&gt;t seems most likely that’ll buy him the R-nomination and later, quite possibly, the US Presidency itself. Depressing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Romney&#039;s personal wealth is a great asset to him in the nomination process, but in the general election it will probably make not that much of a difference - both sides are looking at collecting something around a &lt;i&gt;billion&lt;/i&gt; dollars in donations for this one, so any tens of millions Romney might chip in from his private purse are useful, but not an insurmountable advantage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I a bad person for having this overbearing desire to visit the RNC and lick the tears of unfathomable sadness directly off the faces of their political consultants?</p>
<p>These results are definitely a positive surprise &#8211; I mean, on the one hand it&#8217;s sad that Santorum is capable of winning anything save for a &#8220;most despicable human being&#8221; award, but on the other hand the continued, and even intensifying GOP infighting has a definite chance of crippling Romney ahead of his nomination.</p>
<p>Santorum as the nominee, of course, would be the best thing that could happen to Obama, better even than Swingrich &#8211; I still think it&#8217;s going to be Romney, though, but hopefully in a sufficiently damaged condition.</p>
<p>StevoR @ #3:</p>
<blockquote><p>t seems most likely that’ll buy him the R-nomination and later, quite possibly, the US Presidency itself. Depressing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Romney&#8217;s personal wealth is a great asset to him in the nomination process, but in the general election it will probably make not that much of a difference &#8211; both sides are looking at collecting something around a <i>billion</i> dollars in donations for this one, so any tens of millions Romney might chip in from his private purse are useful, but not an insurmountable advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ ^ Francisco Bacopa : I&#039;m not sure that works on any FTB blog -it doesnt on Pharnygula.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^ Francisco Bacopa : I&#8217;m not sure that works on any FTB blog -it doesnt on Pharnygula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Francisco Bacopa		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francisco Bacopa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These victories have knocked &quot;Spreading Santorum&quot; out of the number one place. We must talk about 
&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://spreadingsantorum.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Santorum&lt;/A&gt; as much as possible and hyperlink 
&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://spreadingsantorum.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Santorum&lt;/A&gt;  as often as possible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These victories have knocked &#8220;Spreading Santorum&#8221; out of the number one place. We must talk about<br />
<a HREF="http://spreadingsantorum.com/" rel="nofollow">Santorum</a> as much as possible and hyperlink<br />
<a HREF="http://spreadingsantorum.com/" rel="nofollow">Santorum</a>  as often as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Revolting to see santorum doing so well - &quot;Mr Stinkyfroth&quot; is about as appetising as he sounds - but I still reckon Mittens will get the R-nom in the end.

I read a good article today in the &lt;i&gt;&#039;Guardian Weekly&#039;&lt;/i&gt; newspaper on the role money plays in US politics. Great quote from there :

&lt;blockquote&gt;“Money in American politics was already an elephant in the room. Now the supreme court [lack of caps original- ed.] has given it a laxative, taken away the shovel and asked us to ignore both the sight and the stench.”
- Page 19, &lt;i&gt;“In the US money always matters”&lt;/i&gt; opinion (?) article by Gary Younge, &lt;i&gt;‘Guardian Weekly’&lt;/i&gt;, 3rd-9th Feb. 2012.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The same source notes that Mittens Romney, apparently, has *double* the personal wealth of the last *eight* presidents &lt;b&gt;combined.&lt;/b&gt; (Not sure if that includes Obama or not.)

It seems most likely that’ll buy him the R-nomination and later, quite possibly, the US Presidency itself. Depressing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revolting to see santorum doing so well &#8211; &#8220;Mr Stinkyfroth&#8221; is about as appetising as he sounds &#8211; but I still reckon Mittens will get the R-nom in the end.</p>
<p>I read a good article today in the <i>&#8216;Guardian Weekly&#8217;</i> newspaper on the role money plays in US politics. Great quote from there :</p>
<blockquote><p>“Money in American politics was already an elephant in the room. Now the supreme court [lack of caps original- ed.] has given it a laxative, taken away the shovel and asked us to ignore both the sight and the stench.”<br />
&#8211; Page 19, <i>“In the US money always matters”</i> opinion (?) article by Gary Younge, <i>‘Guardian Weekly’</i>, 3rd-9th Feb. 2012.</p></blockquote>
<p>The same source notes that Mittens Romney, apparently, has *double* the personal wealth of the last *eight* presidents <b>combined.</b> (Not sure if that includes Obama or not.)</p>
<p>It seems most likely that’ll buy him the R-nomination and later, quite possibly, the US Presidency itself. Depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Azkyroth		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azkyroth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll be interesting to read what Ed has to say about this a week from now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to read what Ed has to say about this a week from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lordshipmayhem		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/santorum-wins-chilly-tuesday/#comment-20125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordshipmayhem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2215#comment-20125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The new M&#038;M flavour: Santorum.  Yummers... not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new M&amp;M flavour: Santorum.  Yummers&#8230; not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
