<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Breaking News: Proposition 8 is unconstitutional	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/breaking-news-proposition-8-is-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/breaking-news-proposition-8-is-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: gwen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/breaking-news-proposition-8-is-unconstitutional/#comment-20112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gwen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2208#comment-20112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One more stop, and it&#039;s a wrap! I understand there are people here in CA trying to get an amendment on the ballot to repeal prop 8. Where do I sign?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more stop, and it&#8217;s a wrap! I understand there are people here in CA trying to get an amendment on the ballot to repeal prop 8. Where do I sign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: scotlyn		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/02/07/breaking-news-proposition-8-is-unconstitutional/#comment-20111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scotlyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=2208#comment-20111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On balance, I think testing the constitutionality of a marriage ban is the way to go.  Trying to legislate to &quot;allow&quot; gay marriage implies the possibility that legistation can just as readily disallow it.  

Remembering Martin Luther King&#039;s analogy that the constitution provided a check or promissory note for all citizens that civil rights campaigners were aiming to &quot;cash&quot; on behalf of black people, the constitutional testing of marriage bans is based on the idea that the rights are already there, simply not yet &quot;encashed&quot; so far a gay people are concerned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On balance, I think testing the constitutionality of a marriage ban is the way to go.  Trying to legislate to &#8220;allow&#8221; gay marriage implies the possibility that legistation can just as readily disallow it.  </p>
<p>Remembering Martin Luther King&#8217;s analogy that the constitution provided a check or promissory note for all citizens that civil rights campaigners were aiming to &#8220;cash&#8221; on behalf of black people, the constitutional testing of marriage bans is based on the idea that the rights are already there, simply not yet &#8220;encashed&#8221; so far a gay people are concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
