Comments on: William M. Briggs has misunderstood a high-school level data graph

By: Shakil

Shakil — Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:49:52 +0000

Briggs is a rightwing nut. Hell he gave an interview in amerika. And thats just the,tip of the iceberg of his rightwing bullshit.

By: Douleur

Douleur — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:35:20 +0000

Dr. William M. Briggs
He talks about God.

However, he is a hypocrite.
And he is a married person.
He tempted me who was skeptics same as him.
I was not able to have a meal for the shock for a while.
Please be careful about him when you are a woman.
Because he did not reflect at all, I posted this.
https://douleurblog.wordpress.com/

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:28:21 +0000

“If you want to be taken seriously you should start taking the work itself seriously.”

No normal, sane, thinking person can take a climitard seriously… come on.

By: Tim Zannes

Tim Zannes — Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:49:33 +0000

Sorry to be a late comer to this discussion. I am always amazed that the main focus of talk in Climate Change discussion is climate change. There is absolutely no “estimate” or argument against data that show the Earth’s atmosphere is being filled with carbon molecules at an alarming and disastrous rate. Nor is there any real counter to the data that shows the seas are becoming more and more acidic. Climate change, including Global Dimming, are but symptoms of the increased carbon and acidification. Science tells us that the Earth has had previous periods wherein the Earth’s atmosphere was probably unsuitable for human life. Now humans are living in a way that will push the atmosphere and the environment (including the waters) to a point where humans can no longer exist.

By: AJ Virgo

AJ Virgo — Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:20:48 +0000

Greg Laden has made a mistake here because as the graph shows the temp has risen just 1C which is the agreed margin of natural variability therefore the graph shows no Global Warming.

By: Steven Meyerson

Steven Meyerson — Fri, 08 Aug 2014 01:04:39 +0000

Notify me of new posts via email

By: Greg Laden

Greg Laden — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:23:12 +0000

Fred, no I didn’t, but that was my mistake You’re probably right that Dave is not the same bloke as Bloke. Is there some meme in which one calls oneself “tallX” that I’m missing?

By: Fred Streeter

Fred Streeter — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:46:57 +0000

@ Greg Laden | February 2, 2012 3:18 PM TallDave, rather bold of you to sue me for several hundred thousand pounds then come over to my blog and make nasty comments, and violate my blog policy. Did you ensure that TallDave was indeed TallBloke? It seems to me to be unlikely, given that TallBloke's name, as you were once aware, is Roger.

By: rork

rork — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:55:41 +0000

Trivia, but part of my missionary work:

“So the line belongs there.” (the connect-the-dots lines)
Because it’s traditional.
As the number of points gets larger, connecting them gets worse. To hell with tradition – rather ask if it is good.
Allot of what’s traditional in my work (biology) is popular precisely because it is bad (misleading, hiding detail, dumbed-down).

By: F

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:11:43 +0000

Scott A Mandia

No, you broke the link by attaching parentheses to it. If you want an active hyperlink in parentheses, leave spaces.

(Decent primer, that page.)

More fun tips: Don’t put a period directly at the end of a URL, either.