Comments on: Actual Scientists Respond to Fake Scientists at Wall Street Journal https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/ Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:08:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 By: mark https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/#comment-490837 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:08:22 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/#comment-490837 Do Denialists believe that authors will never read what they are quoted as saying? Trenberth noted how he was misrepresented, and how other experts are aware of how he was misrepresented. Unfortunately, these corrections do not always make it to the same audience that hears the misrepresentation.

]]> By: randomfactor https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/#comment-490836 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:33:03 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/#comment-490836 Better link:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577193270727472662.html?KEYWORDS=global+warming

]]> By: Daniel J. Andrews https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/#comment-490835 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:19:40 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/01/31/actual-scientists-respond-to-f/#comment-490835 Nice. I hadn’t realized the WSJ actually published the letter.

]]>