<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Who will win in New Hampshire and what will it mean?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: anthonyallen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/#comment-19431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anthonyallen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=1880#comment-19431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have much to say on the above topic (I suppose that means I should shut up, I guess) except that the more and more that I read about the US electoral system, the more and more confused I become. It seems to me that it&#039;s kinda like like religion, in that it&#039;s a system created by an ancient patriarchy, and people follow it because they don&#039;t know any better. Except with religion, at least there is an alternative.

What baffles me the most about the process is that Americans know that Election Day is in November, and yet I have been hearing about people campaigning since January of last year. Here in Canada, when someone calls an election, 3 months later, we have a new Government. Easy-peasy.

And that, to me, is what&#039;s most fucked up about the system. That it takes so damn long to even pick someone that&#039;s going to run for President, and then the candidates start campaigning all over again. Seems like a huge waste of time and effort to me (not to mention money). 

It&#039;s sad that starting 3 years from now, they&#039;ll be doing it for both parties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have much to say on the above topic (I suppose that means I should shut up, I guess) except that the more and more that I read about the US electoral system, the more and more confused I become. It seems to me that it&#8217;s kinda like like religion, in that it&#8217;s a system created by an ancient patriarchy, and people follow it because they don&#8217;t know any better. Except with religion, at least there is an alternative.</p>
<p>What baffles me the most about the process is that Americans know that Election Day is in November, and yet I have been hearing about people campaigning since January of last year. Here in Canada, when someone calls an election, 3 months later, we have a new Government. Easy-peasy.</p>
<p>And that, to me, is what&#8217;s most fucked up about the system. That it takes so damn long to even pick someone that&#8217;s going to run for President, and then the candidates start campaigning all over again. Seems like a huge waste of time and effort to me (not to mention money). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad that starting 3 years from now, they&#8217;ll be doing it for both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/#comment-19430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=1880#comment-19430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;If Romney wins, and Santorum finishes a strong second, Romney’s position is far worse than if Romney wins and Paul finishes a distant second, for example.&lt;/em&gt;

I agree with that. Paul has a strong organization, though, so the same could be said for as strong Paul second.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If Romney wins, and Santorum finishes a strong second, Romney’s position is far worse than if Romney wins and Paul finishes a distant second, for example.</em></p>
<p>I agree with that. Paul has a strong organization, though, so the same could be said for as strong Paul second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NewEnglandBob		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/#comment-19429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewEnglandBob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=1880#comment-19429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Romney will win NH, and he is leading at the moment in SC. Florida will be the decision maker (where I spend winter). I think Romney will most likely take the nomination and then lose to Obama 55%-45%. It is so easy to rip apart Willard Mittens&#039; positions, since he has taken all sides of every issue. He is a prostitute for votes and cares little about the actual issues and most people will see that in the general election.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney will win NH, and he is leading at the moment in SC. Florida will be the decision maker (where I spend winter). I think Romney will most likely take the nomination and then lose to Obama 55%-45%. It is so easy to rip apart Willard Mittens&#8217; positions, since he has taken all sides of every issue. He is a prostitute for votes and cares little about the actual issues and most people will see that in the general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phillip IV		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/#comment-19428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip IV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=1880#comment-19428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this time it won&#039;t matter much who will win in New Hampshire, but who will come second, and by how much.

The Teabagger vote is currently split between four candidates : Gingrich, Perry, Santorum and Bachmann. The only threat to Romney&#039;s nomination is one of those four managing to rally that whole section of the vote behind them - and that will largely depend on whether one of them manages to pull away from the others during the early primaries. 

If Romney wins, and Santorum finishes a strong second, Romney&#039;s position is far worse than if Romney wins and Paul finishes a distant second, for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this time it won&#8217;t matter much who will win in New Hampshire, but who will come second, and by how much.</p>
<p>The Teabagger vote is currently split between four candidates : Gingrich, Perry, Santorum and Bachmann. The only threat to Romney&#8217;s nomination is one of those four managing to rally that whole section of the vote behind them &#8211; and that will largely depend on whether one of them manages to pull away from the others during the early primaries. </p>
<p>If Romney wins, and Santorum finishes a strong second, Romney&#8217;s position is far worse than if Romney wins and Paul finishes a distant second, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/#comment-19427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=1880#comment-19427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Who will win in New Hampshire and what will it mean?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My feeling, how I&#039;d answer this as an interested spectator, is that Mitt Romney will be the winner - and he&#039;ll easily end up as the 2012 Republican nominee. 

Why? Because Mittens is by far and obviously the least worst &lt;i&gt;(realistic*)&lt;/i&gt; Republican candidate even with his mormon magic jocks. I think he&#039;s a safe bet for Republican nominee and would be *very* surprised if one of the many crazy not-Romney contenders somehow gets up. I think it&#039;s not an open field - more just a weak one. These are the best they can do? Yeesh.

Whether he can beat Obama in 2012 is  another question again and will depend on a lot of things mainly I predict the state of the US (&#038; global) economy at the time. 

Maybe, hopefully, if Romney wins ( approx. 60:40 against?) he won&#039;t be too bad for the USA and world as a relative moderate who may be able to drag the Republicans back towards the centre and calm down the overheated partisan rhetoric &#038; atmosphere somewhat? 


PS. Yeah, I&#039;m kinda stating the obvious in most of thisexcept maybe that last paragrpah. Still.
------------------- 

* Realistic runners sadly NOT incl. Jon Huntsman &#038; including as a very unlikey option the disgusting Santorum. I&#039;d say right now its already down to just  Romney, Gingrich, Paul &#038; Santorum.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Who will win in New Hampshire and what will it mean?
</p></blockquote>
<p>My feeling, how I&#8217;d answer this as an interested spectator, is that Mitt Romney will be the winner &#8211; and he&#8217;ll easily end up as the 2012 Republican nominee. </p>
<p>Why? Because Mittens is by far and obviously the least worst <i>(realistic*)</i> Republican candidate even with his mormon magic jocks. I think he&#8217;s a safe bet for Republican nominee and would be *very* surprised if one of the many crazy not-Romney contenders somehow gets up. I think it&#8217;s not an open field &#8211; more just a weak one. These are the best they can do? Yeesh.</p>
<p>Whether he can beat Obama in 2012 is  another question again and will depend on a lot of things mainly I predict the state of the US (&amp; global) economy at the time. </p>
<p>Maybe, hopefully, if Romney wins ( approx. 60:40 against?) he won&#8217;t be too bad for the USA and world as a relative moderate who may be able to drag the Republicans back towards the centre and calm down the overheated partisan rhetoric &amp; atmosphere somewhat? </p>
<p>PS. Yeah, I&#8217;m kinda stating the obvious in most of thisexcept maybe that last paragrpah. Still.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- </p>
<p>* Realistic runners sadly NOT incl. Jon Huntsman &amp; including as a very unlikey option the disgusting Santorum. I&#8217;d say right now its already down to just  Romney, Gingrich, Paul &amp; Santorum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rich Stage		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/01/09/who-will-win-in-new-hampshire-and-what-will-it-mean/#comment-19426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Stage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=1880#comment-19426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Need guidance? You just have to ask.
Grandpa is up to the task!
He&#039;ll soon pick who wins
New Hampshire, and then
the idiocy will be unmasked.


Grandpa, the howler monkey described as &quot;barely psychic&quot;, will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/01/grandpa-monkey-new-hampshire.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;picking the winner&lt;/a&gt; of the New Hampshire primary today. Well, he&#039;ll be choosing a banana with a candidate&#039;s name written on it, but is REALLY that much different from how we do things?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need guidance? You just have to ask.<br />
Grandpa is up to the task!<br />
He&#8217;ll soon pick who wins<br />
New Hampshire, and then<br />
the idiocy will be unmasked.</p>
<p>Grandpa, the howler monkey described as &#8220;barely psychic&#8221;, will be <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/01/grandpa-monkey-new-hampshire.html" rel="nofollow">picking the winner</a> of the New Hampshire primary today. Well, he&#8217;ll be choosing a banana with a candidate&#8217;s name written on it, but is REALLY that much different from how we do things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
