<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: GRAIL closing in on Moon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Success! Well half of it anyhow. GRAIL A has successful entered lunar orbit - GRAIL-B still has to do the same at least last I&#039;ve seen. 

See : 

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/grail20111231.html# 

&amp; GRAIL website here : 

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/main/index.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Success! Well half of it anyhow. GRAIL A has successful entered lunar orbit &#8211; GRAIL-B still has to do the same at least last I&#8217;ve seen. </p>
<p>See : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/grail20111231.html#" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/grail20111231.html#</a> </p>
<p>&#038; GRAIL website here : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/main/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/main/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: daedalus2u		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daedalus2u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suspect that they are using ion drives which are low thrust but high specific impulse.  Once you are in space all that matters is the total impulse, not the thrust.  It takes a lot of thrust to get clear of the atmosphere and into orbit and high thrust means high fuel consumption.  

They need to be able to adjust the orbits of each one, so as to keep them flying together.  Using the same ion drive to get to the moon makes a lot of sense because it conserves mass for payload.  They need to fly very &quot;cleanly&quot;, where all non-gravitational forces can be accounted for.  That includes things like radiation pressure from the sun and from thermal radiation from the satellites themselves.  Off gassing is important too, and that is very hard to predict, so letting them sit in vacuum for a while is a good idea.   

The GRACE experiment was able to measure things like the change in mass of ice in Greenland from its gravity.  Grail will be a lot closer to the moon (the moon has no significant atmosphere), and the moon has a lower gravity field so deviations should be more apparent.  

I don&#039;t think that it is expected that there are any dynamic processes on the moon to actually measure, but if there are, this might be able to see them.  If it could measure voids, like empty lava tubes, that would be very interesting and important.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that they are using ion drives which are low thrust but high specific impulse.  Once you are in space all that matters is the total impulse, not the thrust.  It takes a lot of thrust to get clear of the atmosphere and into orbit and high thrust means high fuel consumption.  </p>
<p>They need to be able to adjust the orbits of each one, so as to keep them flying together.  Using the same ion drive to get to the moon makes a lot of sense because it conserves mass for payload.  They need to fly very &#8220;cleanly&#8221;, where all non-gravitational forces can be accounted for.  That includes things like radiation pressure from the sun and from thermal radiation from the satellites themselves.  Off gassing is important too, and that is very hard to predict, so letting them sit in vacuum for a while is a good idea.   </p>
<p>The GRACE experiment was able to measure things like the change in mass of ice in Greenland from its gravity.  Grail will be a lot closer to the moon (the moon has no significant atmosphere), and the moon has a lower gravity field so deviations should be more apparent.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that it is expected that there are any dynamic processes on the moon to actually measure, but if there are, this might be able to see them.  If it could measure voids, like empty lava tubes, that would be very interesting and important.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steve, good question.  I&#039;m going by what they said in the press release, though I&#039;m not sure if they directly address that.  Perhaps they are using the time well, but stuck with it for some reason having to do with propulsion. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, good question.  I&#8217;m going by what they said in the press release, though I&#8217;m not sure if they directly address that.  Perhaps they are using the time well, but stuck with it for some reason having to do with propulsion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510737</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;But the GRAIL mission has taken months to get there, because of the kind of orbit they wanted to achieve.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is it that or is it more due to their weaker propulsion method and absence of a &lt;i&gt;Saturn V&lt;/i&gt; rocket launcher? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But the GRAIL mission has taken months to get there, because of the kind of orbit they wanted to achieve.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is it that or is it more due to their weaker propulsion method and absence of a <i>Saturn V</i> rocket launcher? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@3. Hengist McStone &#124; December 29, 2011 6:29 PM :

&lt;blockquote&gt;This sounds like a lunar version of GRACE&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

It does doesn&#039;t it? Hope both missions work smoothly and successful and wish those involved the best.

See : 

http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/

&amp; 

http://moon.mit.edu/index.html 

For comparison. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3. Hengist McStone | December 29, 2011 6:29 PM :</p>
<blockquote><p>This sounds like a lunar version of GRACE</p></blockquote>
<p>It does doesn&#8217;t it? Hope both missions work smoothly and successful and wish those involved the best.</p>
<p>See : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/</a></p>
<p>&#038; </p>
<p><a href="http://moon.mit.edu/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://moon.mit.edu/index.html</a> </p>
<p>For comparison. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Alph &#124; December 29, 2011 2:13 PM

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;going around the planet&#039;. Since when is the moon a planet?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Since the nuclear waste dump there exploded and threw it out into interstellar space back on the 13th of September  1999? ;-) 

(See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space:_1999 for details.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alph | December 29, 2011 2:13 PM</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;going around the planet&#8217;. Since when is the moon a planet?</p></blockquote>
<p>Since the nuclear waste dump there exploded and threw it out into interstellar space back on the 13th of September  1999? 😉 </p>
<p>(See : <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space:_1999" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space:_1999</a> for details.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hengist McStone		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hengist McStone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This sounds like a lunar version of GRACE]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a lunar version of GRACE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MadScientist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadScientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s interesting - so they&#039;re not using a gravity sensor like the one used on that ESA satellite a year or two ago? I wonder what the expected magnitude of anomalies are.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting &#8211; so they&#8217;re not using a gravity sensor like the one used on that ESA satellite a year or two ago? I wonder what the expected magnitude of anomalies are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alph		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/12/29/grail-closing-in-on-moon/#comment-510732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;going around the planet&#039;. Since when is the moon a planet?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;going around the planet&#8217;. Since when is the moon a planet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
