<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It turns out Neutrinos actually Do go faster than light!  Maybe.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Art		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I knew it ... I KNEW IT ALL ALONG. ALL YOU SO-CALLED SCIENTISTS ARE FRAUDS JUST PREACHING THE GODLESS AND CORRUPT RELIGION OF SCIENTISM, SECULARISM, EVOLUTION AND HUMANISM.

With that out of the way ... curious. I suspect it&#039;s an artifact of some assumed measurement that is just so very common sense that it gets plugged in without a second glance. A rounding error, the distance of the satellites to earth, failure to account for the time it takes an instrument to register. It&#039;s likely to be something dead simple.

They will find it after they change personnel to get new eyes on the problem and go through the process very, very slowly looking for bad assumptions, errors, failure to account for something. 

Something like, as an illustration, failure to account for the change in the speed of signals through earth&#039;s atmosphere used to position the satellites used to measure distance. That&#039;s not likely it, people trying to figure this out are far swifter and smarter than I am, but that sort of thing. 

Odds are &#039;C&#039; will remain inviolate and, at least for a time, the crushing downfall of all science in a storm of supernaturalism  will be held off. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew it &#8230; I KNEW IT ALL ALONG. ALL YOU SO-CALLED SCIENTISTS ARE FRAUDS JUST PREACHING THE GODLESS AND CORRUPT RELIGION OF SCIENTISM, SECULARISM, EVOLUTION AND HUMANISM.</p>
<p>With that out of the way &#8230; curious. I suspect it&#8217;s an artifact of some assumed measurement that is just so very common sense that it gets plugged in without a second glance. A rounding error, the distance of the satellites to earth, failure to account for the time it takes an instrument to register. It&#8217;s likely to be something dead simple.</p>
<p>They will find it after they change personnel to get new eyes on the problem and go through the process very, very slowly looking for bad assumptions, errors, failure to account for something. </p>
<p>Something like, as an illustration, failure to account for the change in the speed of signals through earth&#8217;s atmosphere used to position the satellites used to measure distance. That&#8217;s not likely it, people trying to figure this out are far swifter and smarter than I am, but that sort of thing. </p>
<p>Odds are &#8216;C&#8217; will remain inviolate and, at least for a time, the crushing downfall of all science in a storm of supernaturalism  will be held off. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CherryBombSim		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509635</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CherryBombSim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Curiouser and curiouser.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiouser and curiouser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They claim to be totally sure about those things. But, that&#039;s probably what&#039;s wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They claim to be totally sure about those things. But, that&#8217;s probably what&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Thille		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Thille]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/11/18/it-turns-out-neutrinos-actual/#comment-509633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, this is completely simplistic, but how sure are they about the distance and the synchronization of the clocks.  It seems like (aside from Einstein getting it wrong) those are now the only two options, right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is completely simplistic, but how sure are they about the distance and the synchronization of the clocks.  It seems like (aside from Einstein getting it wrong) those are now the only two options, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
