<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Scientist is Dead	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/10/08/the-scientist-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/10/08/the-scientist-is-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Schenck		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/10/08/the-scientist-is-dead/#comment-508889</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schenck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/10/08/the-scientist-is-dead/#comment-508889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder how much this means for Open Access journals, since the &#039;new&#039; owner was all about that. He says that their big problem is that they were dependant on page-advertisements, I wonder if he just gave up on it because he thinks its a failed model, a priori anyway? 
And to be clear I am pretty much blindly speculating here, not knowing much about the issue.

Its also interesting that one of the comments in the article was &#039;I would&#039;ve bought 3 years of subscriptions to this magazine had I known it was in trouble, I was waiting for an iPad version&#039;. News Flash, /every/ piece of print media is teetering on the edge, if you&#039;ve ever wanted it, /now/ is the time to start supporting it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much this means for Open Access journals, since the &#8216;new&#8217; owner was all about that. He says that their big problem is that they were dependant on page-advertisements, I wonder if he just gave up on it because he thinks its a failed model, a priori anyway?<br />
And to be clear I am pretty much blindly speculating here, not knowing much about the issue.</p>
<p>Its also interesting that one of the comments in the article was &#8216;I would&#8217;ve bought 3 years of subscriptions to this magazine had I known it was in trouble, I was waiting for an iPad version&#8217;. News Flash, /every/ piece of print media is teetering on the edge, if you&#8217;ve ever wanted it, /now/ is the time to start supporting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
