<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SCOTUS: Execute Troy Davis	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nemo		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There was a vote in the court, but we don&#039;t know the numbers. In these situations, apparently, that&#039;s how it&#039;s done. Justices can choose to make dissenting statements (technically not &quot;opinions&quot;), none did in this case, but that doesn&#039;t mean that it was unanimous.

At least that&#039;s what the MSNBC people told me.

lordshipmayhem: No, but they&#039;ll be happy to execute the new suspect, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a vote in the court, but we don&#8217;t know the numbers. In these situations, apparently, that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s done. Justices can choose to make dissenting statements (technically not &#8220;opinions&#8221;), none did in this case, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that it was unanimous.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s what the MSNBC people told me.</p>
<p>lordshipmayhem: No, but they&#8217;ll be happy to execute the new suspect, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lordshipmayhem		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11704</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordshipmayhem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So I am told there was no physical evidence supporting Davis&#039; guilt.  What happens in the event that physical evidence comes out indicating that someone else - someone they identify - murdered the unfortunate police officer?

It&#039;s not like something like this hasn&#039;t happened before.  Canada alone has had something like a half-dozen convicted murderers declared innocent in the past 20 years.  All were convicted on what turns out to be remarkably similar evidence to what Mr. Davis was convicted with.

Does Georgia dig up Mr. Davis and give him his life back?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I am told there was no physical evidence supporting Davis&#8217; guilt.  What happens in the event that physical evidence comes out indicating that someone else &#8211; someone they identify &#8211; murdered the unfortunate police officer?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like something like this hasn&#8217;t happened before.  Canada alone has had something like a half-dozen convicted murderers declared innocent in the past 20 years.  All were convicted on what turns out to be remarkably similar evidence to what Mr. Davis was convicted with.</p>
<p>Does Georgia dig up Mr. Davis and give him his life back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jason, I did not hear that they considered the case or issued an opinion, but I&#039;ll be checking on that this morning.  I only heard that they rejected a stay (according to CNN).  There would only be dissenting opinions if there was an opinion.  

Sundog, I think they could rule on this a number of ways, not just the death penalty related question.  Due process, etc. But, again, they didn&#039;t rule, I think.  (I await Nina Totenberg or someone to explain this all in the morning.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, I did not hear that they considered the case or issued an opinion, but I&#8217;ll be checking on that this morning.  I only heard that they rejected a stay (according to CNN).  There would only be dissenting opinions if there was an opinion.  </p>
<p>Sundog, I think they could rule on this a number of ways, not just the death penalty related question.  Due process, etc. But, again, they didn&#8217;t rule, I think.  (I await Nina Totenberg or someone to explain this all in the morning.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Thibeault		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Thibeault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 04:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I heard &quot;no dissenting opinions&quot; rather than &quot;unanimous&quot;. I understand they mean different things. Are we sure it was unanimous?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard &#8220;no dissenting opinions&#8221; rather than &#8220;unanimous&#8221;. I understand they mean different things. Are we sure it was unanimous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SundogA		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SundogA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 03:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unfortunate. I can somewhat understand - the Death Penalty has been ruled constitutional a score of times, and that&#039;s really all the Supreme Court can rule on - but given Davis&#039; conviction seems to be rather tenuous at best, I wish they had something they could do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunate. I can somewhat understand &#8211; the Death Penalty has been ruled constitutional a score of times, and that&#8217;s really all the Supreme Court can rule on &#8211; but given Davis&#8217; conviction seems to be rather tenuous at best, I wish they had something they could do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tuibguy		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11700</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tuibguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 02:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope so, too, Gwen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope so, too, Gwen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gwen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/22/scotus-execute-troy-davis/#comment-11699</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gwen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 02:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=275#comment-11699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hopefully, an end to the death penalty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, an end to the death penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
