<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Too Pretty for Homework and Allergic to Algebra	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Zvan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Zvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[George, I think we&#039;re saying the same thing more than you think we are. 

I&#039;m pointing out that the socialization of boys also contains elements that can interfere with learning. And given that societies that have become more egalitarian have focused on treating girls more like boys, while treating boys more like girls is still often taboo, I don&#039;t think we have the data to say anything about relative underlying performance even if we assume some biological basis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, I think we&#8217;re saying the same thing more than you think we are. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pointing out that the socialization of boys also contains elements that can interfere with learning. And given that societies that have become more egalitarian have focused on treating girls more like boys, while treating boys more like girls is still often taboo, I don&#8217;t think we have the data to say anything about relative underlying performance even if we assume some biological basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: George W.		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11579</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steph,
I&#039;m not claiming that you can&#039;t have an egalitarian society without gender roles.  I&#039;m suggesting that even egalitarian societies can have gender roles that cause differences in performance through entirely social constructs.
I&#039;m also unscientifically suggesting that &lt;b&gt;if&lt;/b&gt; it were possible to have a society with no gender roles, and &lt;b&gt;if&lt;/b&gt; sex biologically determines proficiency at mathematics, your evidence seems to suggest that women- stripped of gender roles- are potentially better at math.  
Since Betasattva clearly accepts that &quot;nurture&quot; is an important factor, but that &quot;nature&quot; also plays a role- studies seem to suggest that as gender roles tend toward egalitarianism- women quickly close the gap in math scores.  Could it not be argued, then, that in an imaginary gender neutral society women would surpass men- if we take Betasattva&#039;s tack that &quot;biological gender affects performance in mathematics&quot; is the null hypothesis?
I&#039;d also like to argue, at least anecdotally and based on a case study of one- that being male adversely affects ones ability to assess the scientific significance of internet information.
Just sayin&#039;.....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph,<br />
I&#8217;m not claiming that you can&#8217;t have an egalitarian society without gender roles.  I&#8217;m suggesting that even egalitarian societies can have gender roles that cause differences in performance through entirely social constructs.<br />
I&#8217;m also unscientifically suggesting that <b>if</b> it were possible to have a society with no gender roles, and <b>if</b> sex biologically determines proficiency at mathematics, your evidence seems to suggest that women- stripped of gender roles- are potentially better at math.<br />
Since Betasattva clearly accepts that &#8220;nurture&#8221; is an important factor, but that &#8220;nature&#8221; also plays a role- studies seem to suggest that as gender roles tend toward egalitarianism- women quickly close the gap in math scores.  Could it not be argued, then, that in an imaginary gender neutral society women would surpass men- if we take Betasattva&#8217;s tack that &#8220;biological gender affects performance in mathematics&#8221; is the null hypothesis?<br />
I&#8217;d also like to argue, at least anecdotally and based on a case study of one- that being male adversely affects ones ability to assess the scientific significance of internet information.<br />
Just sayin&#8217;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Betasattva.  

&lt;em&gt;falsifying a biological basis for gender differences&lt;/em&gt;

Falsifying something you made up?  

&lt;em&gt;Youâ€™re retreated to personal attacks&lt;/em&gt;

Again I haven&#039;t seen any ad hominem arguments here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Betasattva.  </p>
<p><em>falsifying a biological basis for gender differences</em></p>
<p>Falsifying something you made up?  </p>
<p><em>Youâ€™re retreated to personal attacks</em></p>
<p>Again I haven&#8217;t seen any ad hominem arguments here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Zvan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Zvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™m declaring victory.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of &lt;i&gt;course&lt;/i&gt; you are. It&#039;s ever so much easier than presenting evidence to back up your assertions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Iâ€™m declaring victory.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of <i>course</i> you are. It&#8217;s ever so much easier than presenting evidence to back up your assertions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[George!  You&#039;ve rediscovered Fisher&#039;s Theorem but for behavior! Brilliant!  That could even be real.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George!  You&#8217;ve rediscovered Fisher&#8217;s Theorem but for behavior! Brilliant!  That could even be real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Betasattva		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Betasattva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Stephanie. None of the links you presented came anywhere close to falsifying a biological basis for gender differences in math and reading aptitude, let alone the dozens of other commonly observed gender differences. You&#039;re retreated to personal attacks, so I&#039;m declaring victory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephanie. None of the links you presented came anywhere close to falsifying a biological basis for gender differences in math and reading aptitude, let alone the dozens of other commonly observed gender differences. You&#8217;re retreated to personal attacks, so I&#8217;m declaring victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Zvan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Zvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also, from something she said elsewhere, I think Roweenie thinks you&#039;re a &quot;poopyhead.&quot; Or maybe it was a &quot;douche.&quot; Not that they&#039;re mutually exclusive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, from something she said elsewhere, I think Roweenie thinks you&#8217;re a &#8220;poopyhead.&#8221; Or maybe it was a &#8220;douche.&#8221; Not that they&#8217;re mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Zvan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Zvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Betasattva, if you have a memory problem, you could reread the thread and look at all the scientific evidence that has been presented to you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betasattva, if you have a memory problem, you could reread the thread and look at all the scientific evidence that has been presented to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Betasattva		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11572</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Betasattva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Roweenie. I get that you think I&#039;m wrong and that there is no science to support your assertion. That about sums up this entire thread.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roweenie. I get that you think I&#8217;m wrong and that there is no science to support your assertion. That about sums up this entire thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Zvan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/09/13/too-pretty-for-homework-and-allergic-to-algebra/#comment-11571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Zvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethoughtblogs.com/xblog/?p=157#comment-11571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[George, there&#039;s a difference between an egalitarian society and one that doesn&#039;t define gender roles. It is possible to have &quot;men&#039;s work&quot; and &quot;women&#039;s work&quot; and still value them essentially equally. For example, it is possible to believe a woman&#039;s voice should be calmer and quieter than a man&#039;s but to still stop and pay attention when she speaks. So it is possible to have expectations of boys--say, that they&#039;re more active and less attentive--that could disadvantage them in school setting, even in an egalitarian society.

Similarly, there is at least some evidence that the relative rates of diagnosis of learning disabilities that Greg talks about are a social artifact. Hard to say for sure with the research that&#039;s been done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, there&#8217;s a difference between an egalitarian society and one that doesn&#8217;t define gender roles. It is possible to have &#8220;men&#8217;s work&#8221; and &#8220;women&#8217;s work&#8221; and still value them essentially equally. For example, it is possible to believe a woman&#8217;s voice should be calmer and quieter than a man&#8217;s but to still stop and pay attention when she speaks. So it is possible to have expectations of boys&#8211;say, that they&#8217;re more active and less attentive&#8211;that could disadvantage them in school setting, even in an egalitarian society.</p>
<p>Similarly, there is at least some evidence that the relative rates of diagnosis of learning disabilities that Greg talks about are a social artifact. Hard to say for sure with the research that&#8217;s been done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
