<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Predicted Hadron Has Been Found	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: josh		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For perspective, assuming the mass @3 is correct, that&#039;s not much heavier than the b-quark itself (~4.7 GeV) and much lighter than the top quark (~173 GeV). The Higgs is thought to be in the range greater than but close to 114 GeV, although there are some ways to get around this. Supersymmetric partners are theoretically in the 100-1000s GeV range. The proton however (~1 GeV as mentioned above) is made of up and down quarks which are &lt; 0.01 GeV.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For perspective, assuming the mass @3 is correct, that&#8217;s not much heavier than the b-quark itself (~4.7 GeV) and much lighter than the top quark (~173 GeV). The Higgs is thought to be in the range greater than but close to 114 GeV, although there are some ways to get around this. Supersymmetric partners are theoretically in the 100-1000s GeV range. The proton however (~1 GeV as mentioned above) is made of up and down quarks which are < 0.01 GeV.  
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bks		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, no news on Higgs this year.   Particle physics *appears* to be in a foundational crisis, but I freely admit that it is outside my area of expertise.

    --bks
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, no news on Higgs this year.   Particle physics *appears* to be in a foundational crisis, but I freely admit that it is outside my area of expertise.</p>
<p>    &#8211;bks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Lund		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Lund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@1: The link gives a mass of 5.7878 GeV/c&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. That&#039;s a bit more than six times the mass of the proton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1: The link gives a mass of 5.7878 GeV/c<sup>2</sup>. That&#8217;s a bit more than six times the mass of the proton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heavy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: surgoshan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[surgoshan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/21/a-predicted-hadron-has-been-fo/#comment-505431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So... mass?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; mass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
