But obviously, you can’t evaluate how effective things will be without at least *some* of us objectively evaluating the big picture. And right now, there’s a vacuum – certainly some environmental organizations are kneejerk anti-nuclear people. And some are simply conservatives who support nuclear because it’s corporate, ties in with the military, and gives them a good excuse to attack environmentalists. But among people not in either of those two groups, the vacuum I’m speaking of results from some being market-oriented and corporation friendly and dismissive of environmentalists but also accepting of climate science. They’re going to only show data that fits their preconception about it. You’d expect others to be more inclusive and hence accurate, but they’re holding back because they understand the sociology.

There are still only 2 blogs I know of really filling that void, one is Joe Romm’s blog at Think Progress and the other is this one. And this one is on scienceblogs, whereas that one is on a liberal think-tank site.