Look, feminist are telling NFL what to do

That alone is sufficient reason to not take anything you say seriously.

You’re culture is predominantly Matriarchal. You would rather nurture people and help people (Matri) rather than punish them or push them (Patri). I can tell you have integrated the Liberal feminine culture within yourself. Regarding political opinions you are mostly siding with women. Look, I’m mostly liberal too, so don’t take it the wrong way, however, I’m shifting moderate because I see the extreme side of feminism and it’s nothing good, just like extreme conservatism. ..If you want to have my stinky opinion.

I have a slightly different definition of personal culture. Personal culture is the things you were taught and still believe. This knowledge and moral belief system was taught first by your parents, then teachers, peers, and now its reinforced through academia.
Look, feminist are telling NFL what to do; they hold IMMENSE POWER. Look they’re throwing out labels and generalizing a whole population….apparent all men are child abusers, wife beaters, rapist, murders, and everything evil in the world. You say we shouldn’t generalize and stereo type right? This is a homo-social(they don’t know a man’s perspective) man hating culture. There is also this so called “Rape Epidemic” on College Campuses when the FBI is telling us sexual crime is on the decline, especially rape…Rape Statistics are at an all time LOW. GO LOOK IT UP FOR YOURSELF IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME.

This is so depressing and disturbing as man. Why? College used to be where “Peace, LOVE!!!, and happiness,” reined supreme, There used to be free love everywhere in the the late 60’s – early 70’s….NOW EVERY MAN IS A POTENTIAL RAPIST…AAHHHH!!! NO!!! WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE SMOKING? OMG, SOMEBODY LACED THE ENTIRE CAMPUS WITH LSD AND THEY’RE FREAKING OUT.

Apparently if you haven’t noticed this is all a highly charged political movement. People will lie, steal, and cheat regarding politics…Exhibit A: The Rolling Stone published rape allegations that turned out to be COMPLETELY FALSE.
Exhibit B: FBI Rape Statistics- ALL TIME LOW
Exhibit C: Reported Rape on campuses the past 10 yrs—declining.
How much evidence do need? I can keep going

This is far beyond disturbing in another way. We live in a Victim Centric Culture (Matriarchy). People who cry rape aren’t put on a polygraph. Both the alleged perpetrator and the alleged victim need to be put on a polygraph. What’s worse, getting raped, or doing polygraph to catch the guy? If the woman didn’t lie; what does she have to fear? Half the time, Law Enforcement doesn’t even do a rape kit and just take the woman’s word for it. This is not Justice.

Listen, I like equality and fairness too, but this isn’t it at all. This is a pure violation of human rights. The only reason this still has momentum, is men feel guilty for having a penis…this is absurd. Men can’t even think about a woman sexually anymore without being stigmatized…It’s to the point that heterosexual men are being slammed for being straight. Feminist equate all male lust as rape or some other perversion. It’s sickening. Have you heard how these women talk about men? Have you been listening to NPR lately? Its a freaking nightmare or something from Clock Work Orange.

You, sir, have some admiral qualities as a MAN. Are completely evil too? Perhaps you should refer to yourself as The Demonic Male…Muu hahahahah. Join Satan and his minions, sir, for you yourself are a demonic male…the only way you get out of this club is to cut your balls and penis off, Sorry.

Perhaps it would be easier to illistrate protective drives in nature, due to the fact we no longer have any natural predators to display this behavior.

I’m am a father, I know for a fact this is a strong underlying drive. I would, Sir, die for my kids if I had to. How do we quantify this and measure it? Perhaps we could look up Police reports where men have died protecting women and children and count and then compare it to how many women did the same…As I’ve said, women do have some aspects of the male protective instinct. Many women also would die protecting their own kids. But yes, men, Culturally are expected to do this more. To separate it from culture or base drive would be the hard part and would take cross cultural studies.

Thank You for your Repy

I don’t know of any playgrounds that were demolished by the matriarchy, please elaborate, sounds interesting!

I’m very aware of my passive aggressive attacks on the patriarchy, by the way. 🙂

I do believe women are trying today to usurp male dominance on being a provider or leader; it is happening now, but in the process I believe women will develop more aggressive drives to put food on the table and maintain a job in a competitive atmosphere.

Even males have female psyche traits, usually, such as fathers are tender and nurturing in addition to being protective. I learned a lot from women…these teachings are cultural. There is a Matriarchy, especially, in western culture where women can lead and be dominant in some form.

There however are some negative consequences to the Matriarchy, for instance, the imperative to keep children safe has lead to the demolition of playgrounds. Children need to be able to take risks and explore, it is a part of the learning process. Also, the competitive drive may become diminished if we insist too heavily on equality rather than fairness. America is already becoming complacent,less driven, and dependent on the “Mother” State. This will and is leading to decline if it is not put in check. We’ll see.

Sir, I would also point out that you are being protective of women when you refer to men as being “Demonic.” You are displaying some, at least, passive aggressivity when you do this. You didn’t even notice that the demon inside of you does have noble traits…Ding Dong…Oops a display.

In the chimp studies that link to the Demonic Male idea, the male violence is not very much related to competing for females, but rather, for resources.

The sacrificing for women and children thing is probably a cultural trope that varies a lot across societies and circumstances, and I doubt that it applies generally.

You raise a lot of interesting questions, but the point of this post is to point out the nuances and complexities that we need to address, rather than simply equating male vs. female behavior simplistically across the board. Human relationships and gendered behavior are much more like we find in many song birds than what we find in deer, for example, but the temptation to equate human sexual or competitive behavior to the ungulates is strong and misguided. And, we need to be very careful about mapping observed features onto underlying biology without careful thought and study (such as the “men as savior” idea, which really does vary a lot across societies, times, places, and circumstances)

There must be some degree of determinism for most males across must species are usually more aggressive territorial and violent. Also the levels of testosterone do impact aggressivity levels in men on average. This has been proven by studies of testosterone levels of men in prison. Don’t genes affect the amount of testosterone a male has? I’m not saying all men with high-T are violent; some harness these drives and become more driven, but yet disciplined.

Speaking of Demonic Males…
Males across species often compete in some form to attract females. Most of this behavior therefor must be attributed to the Y-chromosome. Wouldn’t that be genetic?
In order to get rid of the “Demonic Male” you’d have to get rid of the Y chromosome in the entire Kingdom Animalia. And then unfortunately everything would go extinct. There has to be some aggressivity in most species, otherwise they wouldn’t be able to protect themselves from predation. They would go the way of the Dodo Bird.

In regards to the violent nature of men…we do have a few noble traits, we used to protect females and young from predators….but are no natural predators other than ourselves anymore…But what about disasters? Men today still would sacrifice themselves to protect women and children. There has to be some way to verify this because I do believe men are more willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of women and children. Occasionally a good man will protect a woman and child from bad man or on even rarer occasions, he might even slay a beast praying upon women in children…but, that’s rare today and may be why Romance went extinct. We all know a woman would love a man that would die for her.
But let’s say the feminist find a way to multiply through cloning.
If we neuter every male, then won’t risk taking behavior that is necessary go extinct. What do I mean? What about Space Exploration?…In a way, that may take more Balls than Brains. Might we become too complacent and less “driven” and still go extinct in the process when the environment collapses under our weight.

What does survival of the fittest entail? Did we get to this position as the dominant species by being sweet, cuddly, and non-violent creatures? I’m not going to answer that one, I’m just being Captain Obvious.

Any man that wouldn’t chop the head off a venomous snake if children are nearby is completely worthless, at the very least he could trap it and relocate it, but that would take the male behavioral trait known as bravery, which feminist refer to as stupidity. Yes, you do have to have more balls than brains when dealing with snakes, but I do believe this species needs those “Domonic” traits, otherwise we still may go the way of the Dodo Bird.

On the other hand, reference to deep genetics does an abysmal job of explaining variation.