<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;God&#8217;s Lady Problem&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Haubrich		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500252</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Haubrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rash, we accept phone calls and comments to the show if you wish to point out where you disagree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rash, we accept phone calls and comments to the show if you wish to point out where you disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rash		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry, don&#039;t agree to some of your points in Radio show.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, don&#8217;t agree to some of your points in Radio show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave: I&#039;m sitting here reading your comment and thinking &quot;What, he can&#039;t read my post? What&#039;s up?&quot; then I realized that the post I wrote with the details about the earthquakes is scheduled for tomorrow. And yes, essentially.  

Which proves nothing, which is why they are going to have to do it again.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: I&#8217;m sitting here reading your comment and thinking &#8220;What, he can&#8217;t read my post? What&#8217;s up?&#8221; then I realized that the post I wrote with the details about the earthquakes is scheduled for tomorrow. And yes, essentially.  </p>
<p>Which proves nothing, which is why they are going to have to do it again.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave X		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m afraid I ignored the graphs and read the 6.5 number directly from the text ant thought you should post 6-point something rather than 7-point-something.

To get the return intervals, I read Jen&#039;s link to http://web.ics.purdue.edu/%7Ebraile/new/EqStatistics.pdf and inverted the average numbers per year in &quot;frequency of occurence&quot; table, which he in turn copied from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/year/eqstats.php  365/15=24days and 365/134=2.7days (I made an error above), and the 5-point somethings have a return interval of 365*24/1319=6.6hrs.  

From magnitude 2 through 8, it looks like each log-scale Richter-scale point is worth about a factor of ten in frequency and return interval.

In any case, the chance of repeating the 6.0 or greater thing that happened last boobquake would be about 1/3, while the 7.0+ prediction has about a 1/24 chance of happening.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I ignored the graphs and read the 6.5 number directly from the text ant thought you should post 6-point something rather than 7-point-something.</p>
<p>To get the return intervals, I read Jen&#8217;s link to <a href="http://web.ics.purdue.edu/%7Ebraile/new/EqStatistics.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://web.ics.purdue.edu/%7Ebraile/new/EqStatistics.pdf</a> and inverted the average numbers per year in &#8220;frequency of occurence&#8221; table, which he in turn copied from <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/year/eqstats.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/year/eqstats.php</a>  365/15=24days and 365/134=2.7days (I made an error above), and the 5-point somethings have a return interval of 365*24/1319=6.6hrs.  </p>
<p>From magnitude 2 through 8, it looks like each log-scale Richter-scale point is worth about a factor of ten in frequency and return interval.</p>
<p>In any case, the chance of repeating the 6.0 or greater thing that happened last boobquake would be about 1/3, while the 7.0+ prediction has about a 1/24 chance of happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave, unfortunately, that graph is a great example of how to not make a graph!  An outlier drives all the other data into the corner.  Adjsuting (logging, or something) the data and/or sampling around the outlier(s) would look very different.

I think there just my be something to this boob-earthquake link.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, unfortunately, that graph is a great example of how to not make a graph!  An outlier drives all the other data into the corner.  Adjsuting (logging, or something) the data and/or sampling around the outlier(s) would look very different.</p>
<p>I think there just my be something to this boob-earthquake link.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: oldebabe		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldebabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No here mystery, and no surprises, either, i.e. there is an earthquake (or even several) every day somewhere on earth.  That, apparently, already keeps a quake creator very busy spotting the multitude of exposed cleavage.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No here mystery, and no surprises, either, i.e. there is an earthquake (or even several) every day somewhere on earth.  That, apparently, already keeps a quake creator very busy spotting the multitude of exposed cleavage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave X		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/03/08/gods-lady-problem/#comment-500246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[6-point-something: http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/and-boobquake-results-are-in.html

6-point-somethings have a return interval of about 2.5 days, while 7-point-somethings have a return interval of about 24 days.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6-point-something: <a href="http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/and-boobquake-results-are-in.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/and-boobquake-results-are-in.html</a></p>
<p>6-point-somethings have a return interval of about 2.5 days, while 7-point-somethings have a return interval of about 24 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
