Comments on: Michele Bachmann is an Unmitigated Idiot and Racist

By: [D.C.D.A] Duderocket69

[D.C.D.A] Duderocket69 — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:33:50 +0000

The American Civil War was not started because of slavery. It was originally fought over the “more money” that either machines would bring or the hard labor of the enslaved Africans. Abraham Lincoln even said that the war was not started to end slavery. Abraham Lincoln states,”“I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” SO there you have it. He did not even care until the war was in progress that slavery should end. That is one thing that Michele Bachmann should know. So she can shut her mouth up and stop coming up “political” tales!

By: Ranmaa Guererol

Ranmaa Guererol — Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:31:57 +0000

I am delighted to see this you tube video at this web page, thus now I am also going to add all my movies at YouTube site.

By: Angie

Angie — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:59:09 +0000

Jeez, that’s a lot of comments. All that for me to say I agree – she’s a moron. 🙂

By: JACK

JACK — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:40:59 +0000

SO THE KIDS WHO DIED DURING THIS HURRICAN WERE PUNISHED BY GOD BECAUSE OF WASHINGTON POLITICS? I THINK SHE NEEDS A GIANT TREE LIMB UP HER ARSE AND COME OUT OF HER MOUTH TO SHUT HER HOLE UP.

By: Marple

Marple — Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:29:18 +0000

Hannah, do you have a specific criticism or are your shorts in a knot because you’re a teabagger and, well, you’ve all got your shorts in knots?

By: Hannah

Hannah — Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:29:35 +0000

I feel like a 7th grader wrote this article. If you purport to be so knowledgeable about so many important issues, please return to your local undergraduate university to learn to write more concisely and meaningfully. You can’t honestly expect to make such sweeping criticisms of any person or theory when you fumble for words and effective, powerful syntax. Maybe I’ll buy what you’re selling when you turn from a blogger know-it-all to an actual journalist.

By: Hannah

Hannah — Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:26:10 +0000

I feel like a 7th grader wrote this article. If you’re going to make sweeping criticisms and purport to b so knowledgeable and educated, please return to your local undergraduate university and learn to write more meaningfully and concisely. Then, maybe I will buy into what you’re selling.

By: StevoR

StevoR — Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:10:29 +0000

@228. Greg Laden | August 15, 2011 11:08 AM

That is worth some research and a blog post.

And I see you’ve now got on on that here :

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/08/i_am_iowan_i_am_barn.php

thanks. 🙂

By: pornonymous

pornonymous — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:49:47 +0000

Raper: There IS much to be said for the value of ‘tone’ in a discussion of any kind–except with you–a Sheriff Araipo voter.(!!!!sound of Raping Bee salivating at the thought of blacks, Natives, Latino’s and po’ white folks sweating in tent prisons.)

Your hostility and overt rageful manner do not suggest dialectic/logic possibilities.

On the other hand, speaking of immature ( especially for a very old 52 year old), look at how you ate the bait–poopoo on a stick.

Yup, I said that, but I really wanted to see if you would do the homework for once–that’s the only way to deal with bad 52 year old children–trick em’ into wanting to do the work.

and re: “he was well within the norm of people who seek power, and status, and who are also known to misuse power and status. For examples, think Mao-v-Deng, or Lenin-v- Trotsky, etc”

Maybe you in all your seniority ( suppressing chuckle) can tell me how dissing someone from a podium is NOT a power move, or a preemptive diss?

Bee, you old commie–your just nuts, or you forget your history. But, um–I am leaning towards both.

Perhaps if I had said Adler was dissed by Freud at the Geneva Societyyou might not have started your yap running in circles.

But get used to talking–I mean, analogies are part of talking–or didn’t they teach you that in white-middle-class drug dealer school?

But you are an old commie, so here is a refresher of the nature of disagreements within movements:

“Although Trotsky had supported Lenin against the opposition of Kamenev and Zinoviev on the need to organise an insurrection in October 1917 he was to find himself at loggerheads with him at the beginning of 1918 on the signing of a peace treaty with Germany”

and of course that damned MAO and his group, dissmissing people from podiums!

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/china2.htm

By: Raging Bee

Raging Bee — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:19:27 +0000

You’re ONCE AGAIN entirely untrue, unvalidated assertion–RW& Mao? Where the hell did that come from?

It comes from here, asshole:

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/how_badly_did_rebecca_watson_a.php#comment-4706012

And here’s the specific quote, FROM YOUR COMMENT:

Was Rebecca Watson in the right to criticize Stef McGraw from the podium? Yes, she was well within the norm of people who seek power, and status, and who are also known to misuse power and status. For examples, think Mao-v-Deng, or Lenin-v- Trotsky, etc

Either you don’t even have the guts to own up to your own words, or you’re too emotional and thoughtless to remember what you said. Either way, porny-boy, no one here has any reason to take you seriously. You and your belabored bathroom humor have no place in a grownup dialogue.