<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Xfce 4.8 released	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Virgil Samms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Virgil Samms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have been using Fedora for years. This is because it is better geared for a managed environment, as opposed to a single user environment. As you know, Fedora is the &quot;bleeding edge&quot; development bed for Red Hat. They issue a new release twice per year. That&#039;s where they introduce all the newest bugs. Users report the bugs, but frequently the fixes for the bugs don&#039;t get churned into the distribution pipeline until the next release. At which time of course, there is a new crop of bugs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Fedora for years. This is because it is better geared for a managed environment, as opposed to a single user environment. As you know, Fedora is the &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221; development bed for Red Hat. They issue a new release twice per year. That&#8217;s where they introduce all the newest bugs. Users report the bugs, but frequently the fixes for the bugs don&#8217;t get churned into the distribution pipeline until the next release. At which time of course, there is a new crop of bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lassi HippelÃ¤inen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lassi HippelÃ¤inen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Probably the lightest unofficial version of Ubuntu was Crunchbang (Openbox in lieu of Gnome), but recently they abandoned even Ubuntu. Now #! is Debian+Openbox, and the updates are rolling, not biannual.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crunchbang

&lt;em&gt;I am toying with the idea of skipping the &quot;desktop&quot; thing entirely and going with a simple window manager and nothing more on my laptop.&lt;/em&gt;
You are not alone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_OS]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the lightest unofficial version of Ubuntu was Crunchbang (Openbox in lieu of Gnome), but recently they abandoned even Ubuntu. Now #! is Debian+Openbox, and the updates are rolling, not biannual.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crunchbang" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crunchbang</a></p>
<p><em>I am toying with the idea of skipping the &#8220;desktop&#8221; thing entirely and going with a simple window manager and nothing more on my laptop.</em><br />
You are not alone.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_OS" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_OS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The review I mention in Linux Journal says the same thing about LXDE.

Regarding non-linux Distro:  I&#039;m getting a new scanner.  I intend to match the scanner with a distro to get maximum functionality.  It happens that this scanner is heavily tested under Fedora, so I may go that way, but I&#039;ll experiment a bit. It&#039;s in the mail. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The review I mention in Linux Journal says the same thing about LXDE.</p>
<p>Regarding non-linux Distro:  I&#8217;m getting a new scanner.  I intend to match the scanner with a distro to get maximum functionality.  It happens that this scanner is heavily tested under Fedora, so I may go that way, but I&#8217;ll experiment a bit. It&#8217;s in the mail. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MattR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498166</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/01/18/xfce-48-released/#comment-498166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I found the same thing, running Xubuntu on an old laptop (226MB of RAM). Better solution for older hardware is &lt;a href=&quot;http://lubuntu.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lubuntu&lt;/a&gt; which uses &lt;a href=&quot;http://lxde.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LXDE&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s not an officially recognised distro yet (non-Canonical if you&#039;ll pardon the pun) but they&#039;re working on getting official endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said that, the latest XFCE does look kinda nice; might have to run up a VM and try it out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, did you ever decide on a non-Ubuntu distro to try? I&#039;m still enjoying Sabayon.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the same thing, running Xubuntu on an old laptop (226MB of RAM). Better solution for older hardware is <a href="http://lubuntu.net/" rel="nofollow">Lubuntu</a> which uses <a href="http://lxde.org/" rel="nofollow">LXDE</a>. It&#8217;s not an officially recognised distro yet (non-Canonical if you&#8217;ll pardon the pun) but they&#8217;re working on getting official endorsement.</p>
<p>Having said that, the latest XFCE does look kinda nice; might have to run up a VM and try it out.</p>
<p>Oh, did you ever decide on a non-Ubuntu distro to try? I&#8217;m still enjoying Sabayon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
