<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Top Ten Science Stories of 2010	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen Leahy		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Leahy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike at 16. I&#039;d be keen to know of anyone doing analysis on changes in O2 content...as I guess we all would. 

FYI here was my take as a jurno on the plankton decline when the Nature paper came out - plus dead zones &amp; acidification - and speculates on  how loss of plankton may impact on cloud formation ?...(Kind of scared myself re-reading it) 

http://stephenleahy.net/2010/08/06/ocean-losing-its-green-planets-life-support-system-in-decline/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike at 16. I&#8217;d be keen to know of anyone doing analysis on changes in O2 content&#8230;as I guess we all would. </p>
<p>FYI here was my take as a jurno on the plankton decline when the Nature paper came out &#8211; plus dead zones &#038; acidification &#8211; and speculates on  how loss of plankton may impact on cloud formation ?&#8230;(Kind of scared myself re-reading it) </p>
<p><a href="http://stephenleahy.net/2010/08/06/ocean-losing-its-green-planets-life-support-system-in-decline/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://stephenleahy.net/2010/08/06/ocean-losing-its-green-planets-life-support-system-in-decline/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mgr		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oops, I see I am not the only Mike to have posted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I see I am not the only Mike to have posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mgr		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg at 15.

No, I&#039;m not getting the articles confused. I assumed this was what prompted your comment &#039;we are all going to die&#039;. Let me dial it back.

The problem is that the Sci American/ Nature article confirms the NASA satellite measurements, and extends it back in time.  Causality is weak, but I think it would be prudent given the finding to examine possible changes in the partial pressure of oxygen over this period, although my reasons for doing so are probably alarmist.

What I am getting at, is that a decline of 40% and growing in ocean produtivity may lead to a reversal of evolutionary history, ala the Eidacarian (if indeed it is a unique multicellular radiation).  

It&#039;s been hypothesized that photosynthesis altered the earth&#039;s atmosphere from reducing to oxidizing, and is potentially the variable explaining the evolution of multicellular life.  Eliminate oxygen and it&#039;s not possible.

http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Palaeofiles/Cambrian/triggers/extrinsic/extrinsic.html

http://life3.beyondgenes.com/

Second, there a narrow percentage of oxygen in the atmosphere necessary for maintaining oxidative respiration, I think the ranges is 20% to 26%.  (I cannot recall a cite for this, but understand that above 26% and spontaneous ignition would be sustained; and below 20% only diffusion of oxygen for cellular activity can be sustained for aerobes)

[And before someone raises the hyperoxic conditions of the Paleozoic that are inferred responsible for large insects (e.g. the Caboniferous dragonfly with the three foot wingspan), note that the partial pressure of oxygen was near the upper limit of the bound, not beyond.]

The primary production of the ocean is the largest aggregate of carbon dioxide fixation on the planet, and impaired could result in an oxygen deficet that could move the atmospheric partial pressure of oxygen downwards over time.  I doubt terrestrial ecosystems could fill the gap.

Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg at 15.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not getting the articles confused. I assumed this was what prompted your comment &#8216;we are all going to die&#8217;. Let me dial it back.</p>
<p>The problem is that the Sci American/ Nature article confirms the NASA satellite measurements, and extends it back in time.  Causality is weak, but I think it would be prudent given the finding to examine possible changes in the partial pressure of oxygen over this period, although my reasons for doing so are probably alarmist.</p>
<p>What I am getting at, is that a decline of 40% and growing in ocean produtivity may lead to a reversal of evolutionary history, ala the Eidacarian (if indeed it is a unique multicellular radiation).  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been hypothesized that photosynthesis altered the earth&#8217;s atmosphere from reducing to oxidizing, and is potentially the variable explaining the evolution of multicellular life.  Eliminate oxygen and it&#8217;s not possible.</p>
<p><a href="http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Palaeofiles/Cambrian/triggers/extrinsic/extrinsic.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Palaeofiles/Cambrian/triggers/extrinsic/extrinsic.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://life3.beyondgenes.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://life3.beyondgenes.com/</a></p>
<p>Second, there a narrow percentage of oxygen in the atmosphere necessary for maintaining oxidative respiration, I think the ranges is 20% to 26%.  (I cannot recall a cite for this, but understand that above 26% and spontaneous ignition would be sustained; and below 20% only diffusion of oxygen for cellular activity can be sustained for aerobes)</p>
<p>[And before someone raises the hyperoxic conditions of the Paleozoic that are inferred responsible for large insects (e.g. the Caboniferous dragonfly with the three foot wingspan), note that the partial pressure of oxygen was near the upper limit of the bound, not beyond.]</p>
<p>The primary production of the ocean is the largest aggregate of carbon dioxide fixation on the planet, and impaired could result in an oxygen deficet that could move the atmospheric partial pressure of oxygen downwards over time.  I doubt terrestrial ecosystems could fill the gap.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike, you mean the idea that Jupiter is a &quot;failed star&quot; (which is probably not a very good description) or a different story? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, you mean the idea that Jupiter is a &#8220;failed star&#8221; (which is probably not a very good description) or a different story? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Walley		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Walley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An intriguing and eclectic list that you have compiled.  For me however, the stand out story of the year (excluding specific news articles on palaeontology) was the &quot;Jupiter Star&quot;, simply mind-blowing and confirmation, as if anyone needed it, as to just how little we know about our place in the universe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An intriguing and eclectic list that you have compiled.  For me however, the stand out story of the year (excluding specific news articles on palaeontology) was the &#8220;Jupiter Star&#8221;, simply mind-blowing and confirmation, as if anyone needed it, as to just how little we know about our place in the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam Dei Lune		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Dei Lune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your list is very good.  I am hoping that when you do this list next year you will be reporting to us that a cure has been found for said stupidity.  Happy New Year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your list is very good.  I am hoping that when you do this list next year you will be reporting to us that a cure has been found for said stupidity.  Happy New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barbie		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this great list, I need these kind of list for my students for their homework.Thanks a lot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this great list, I need these kind of list for my students for their homework.Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mgr		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Greg.  So it&#039;s the article from behind Nature&#039;s paywall from June.  I thought it might be.

Anybody trying to measure changes in the partial pressure of atmospheric oxygen for the period?  That&#039;s the shoe I am waiting to see drop. (FWIW this is about the most f/u&#039;ed piece of science news I have seen in a while--the mass extinction from this would put the close of the Permian to shame.)

You may also want to see this:

http://www.mindfully.org/Water/2003/Phytoplankton-Decline-Ocean6oct03.htm

Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Greg.  So it&#8217;s the article from behind Nature&#8217;s paywall from June.  I thought it might be.</p>
<p>Anybody trying to measure changes in the partial pressure of atmospheric oxygen for the period?  That&#8217;s the shoe I am waiting to see drop. (FWIW this is about the most f/u&#8217;ed piece of science news I have seen in a while&#8211;the mass extinction from this would put the close of the Permian to shame.)</p>
<p>You may also want to see this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mindfully.org/Water/2003/Phytoplankton-Decline-Ocean6oct03.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.mindfully.org/Water/2003/Phytoplankton-Decline-Ocean6oct03.htm</a></p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike:  Here&#039;s the phytoplankton story: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=phytoplankton-population

The part about people being stupid is self evident, I&#039;m afraid. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  Here&#8217;s the phytoplankton story: <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=phytoplankton-population" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=phytoplankton-population</a></p>
<p>The part about people being stupid is self evident, I&#8217;m afraid. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mgr		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/28/the-top-ten-science-stories-of/#comment-528725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no link for the #1 story.  

Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no link for the #1 story.  </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
