<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What is the ideal camera for the person who&#8230; well, you know&#8230;.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: GrayGaffer		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GrayGaffer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[daedalus2u@32: Greg already covered that one.  When were you last in a Safeway?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daedalus2u@32: Greg already covered that one.  When were you last in a Safeway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Drivebyposter		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528491</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drivebyposter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 08:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/cell-phone-lenses/
I figured I&#039;d post that here for camera freaks. I think it&#039;s a cleverly simple idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/cell-phone-lenses/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/cell-phone-lenses/</a><br />
I figured I&#8217;d post that here for camera freaks. I think it&#8217;s a cleverly simple idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528490</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Olympus Pen looks &amp; acts a lot like a traditional 35mm rangefinder.  You can get a viewfinder, and it has some auto modes. Shutter lag is comparable to the entry-level DSLRs.  Plug in an Eye-Fi card, so she doesn&#039;t have to connect the camera to the computer (wireless upload). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Olympus Pen looks &#038; acts a lot like a traditional 35mm rangefinder.  You can get a viewfinder, and it has some auto modes. Shutter lag is comparable to the entry-level DSLRs.  Plug in an Eye-Fi card, so she doesn&#8217;t have to connect the camera to the computer (wireless upload). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528489</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg, Time for me to upgrade I suppose, I would choose Nikon again for all the reasons Warren mentions plus their near indestrutiblity. The only problem I had was the CCD died on me, Nikon kindly replaced it without charge even though the warranty was several years past it&#039;s expiry date. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, Time for me to upgrade I suppose, I would choose Nikon again for all the reasons Warren mentions plus their near indestrutiblity. The only problem I had was the CCD died on me, Nikon kindly replaced it without charge even though the warranty was several years past it&#8217;s expiry date. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cleek		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cleek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[glue a knob in one spot and the first time cousin Jimmy, the 16 year old geek, grabs it and wants to take some pictures of his sweet new electric guitar, he&#039;s going to break that knob clean off, trying to turn it Macro.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glue a knob in one spot and the first time cousin Jimmy, the 16 year old geek, grabs it and wants to take some pictures of his sweet new electric guitar, he&#8217;s going to break that knob clean off, trying to turn it Macro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528487</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no such thing as an idiot proof DSLR, but I&#039;ve been enamored of the Nikon DSLR line for some time. Their CCDs seem to capture a lot of the same warmth and tonal feel of Kodachrome, which I still miss terribly. The higher-end cameras allow total override of all exposure settings, and the really sexy ones offer (in addition to a lot of MPs) such bonuses as image stabilization &lt;i&gt;in the lens&lt;/i&gt;, and self-cleaning sensors.

I suppose Canon et. al. offer similar features, but I like the warmth and saturation in the Nikon chipset.

For quick point and shoot, the iPhone 4 camera is actually rather good, and has an HDR option. Of course, you have to own an iPhone 4 for thatâ?¦

Good, unbiased reviews of digital cameras can be found at DP Review, http://www.dpreview.com/ - they offer a deep rundown of features, usability, and even side-by-side image comparisons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as an idiot proof DSLR, but I&#8217;ve been enamored of the Nikon DSLR line for some time. Their CCDs seem to capture a lot of the same warmth and tonal feel of Kodachrome, which I still miss terribly. The higher-end cameras allow total override of all exposure settings, and the really sexy ones offer (in addition to a lot of MPs) such bonuses as image stabilization <i>in the lens</i>, and self-cleaning sensors.</p>
<p>I suppose Canon et. al. offer similar features, but I like the warmth and saturation in the Nikon chipset.</p>
<p>For quick point and shoot, the iPhone 4 camera is actually rather good, and has an HDR option. Of course, you have to own an iPhone 4 for thatâ?¦</p>
<p>Good, unbiased reviews of digital cameras can be found at DP Review, <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.dpreview.com/</a> &#8211; they offer a deep rundown of features, usability, and even side-by-side image comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528486</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Alan, the coolpics in that series have an amazing delay.  I once took two hundred pictures of some black bears up north and not one of them is usable, even though I was mostly within 20 or 30 feet of the bears, but they were moving around in the brush.  

The detachable lense SLR&#039;s have no delay.  A bit more expensive though.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, the coolpics in that series have an amazing delay.  I once took two hundred pictures of some black bears up north and not one of them is usable, even though I was mostly within 20 or 30 feet of the bears, but they were moving around in the brush.  </p>
<p>The detachable lense SLR&#8217;s have no delay.  A bit more expensive though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Douglas Watts		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528485</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Watts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If someone really wants a true, no-brainer camera just to take snapshots, they can still buy a disposable camera (with regular old film) at any pharmacy or convenience store for a few bucks, bring it back and pick up the prints. The needs of that demographic are now fully met by the marketplace, at a very affordable cost. There&#039;s no need to go digital if you just want fuzzy snapshots on photo paper. 

The digital camera market assumes you want something more than a disposable. If the person doesn&#039;t understand a memory card is analogous to film then they are beyond all hope ... how do they even know what a camera is? 

All PHS (and higher) cameras default to an automatic mode with auto focus, auto light meter, auto everything, unless you start randomly messing with the manual settings. It&#039;s nearly impossible to take a bad photo with modern digitals, unless you&#039;re a real crappy photographer, and no camera can help with that.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone really wants a true, no-brainer camera just to take snapshots, they can still buy a disposable camera (with regular old film) at any pharmacy or convenience store for a few bucks, bring it back and pick up the prints. The needs of that demographic are now fully met by the marketplace, at a very affordable cost. There&#8217;s no need to go digital if you just want fuzzy snapshots on photo paper. </p>
<p>The digital camera market assumes you want something more than a disposable. If the person doesn&#8217;t understand a memory card is analogous to film then they are beyond all hope &#8230; how do they even know what a camera is? </p>
<p>All PHS (and higher) cameras default to an automatic mode with auto focus, auto light meter, auto everything, unless you start randomly messing with the manual settings. It&#8217;s nearly impossible to take a bad photo with modern digitals, unless you&#8217;re a real crappy photographer, and no camera can help with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Douglas Watts		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528484</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Watts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;The person who never seems to be able to operate, or be happy with, these modern digital cameras ...&lt;/i&gt;

Will never be happy, period. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The person who never seems to be able to operate, or be happy with, these modern digital cameras &#8230;</i></p>
<p>Will never be happy, period. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528483</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/20/what-is-the-ideal-camera-for-t/#comment-528483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gerg, It&#039;s a Nikon coolpix 5700, an early model DSLR (circa 2000) that cost me an arm and a leg. Optics are great and it takes a really nice photo but the shutter delay makes it useless for dynamic subjects such as sports photography, fireworks, etc. 

Perhaps modern DSLR&#039;s have overcome the shutter delay problem?   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerg, It&#8217;s a Nikon coolpix 5700, an early model DSLR (circa 2000) that cost me an arm and a leg. Optics are great and it takes a really nice photo but the shutter delay makes it useless for dynamic subjects such as sports photography, fireworks, etc. </p>
<p>Perhaps modern DSLR&#8217;s have overcome the shutter delay problem?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
