<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Good News and Bad News from the Large Hadron Collider	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ppnl: Doesn&#039;t your second paragraph constitute some sort of religious declaration?  

We have no testable theory but we know it&#039;s true, and we now have prophecies to interpret it once it arrives, which we know it will... Hmmmm. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ppnl: Doesn&#8217;t your second paragraph constitute some sort of religious declaration?  </p>
<p>We have no testable theory but we know it&#8217;s true, and we now have prophecies to interpret it once it arrives, which we know it will&#8230; Hmmmm. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ppnl		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ppnl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[
These findings do not support string theory but then very few people expected any support for string theory at these energies.

No experiment within reach can rule out all versions of string theory. For that reason it may not be accurate to call string theory a theory at all. It may be better to think of string theory as a collection of ideas and techniques that will aid in analyzing new physics once it is sighted.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These findings do not support string theory but then very few people expected any support for string theory at these energies.</p>
<p>No experiment within reach can rule out all versions of string theory. For that reason it may not be accurate to call string theory a theory at all. It may be better to think of string theory as a collection of ideas and techniques that will aid in analyzing new physics once it is sighted.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: g724		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[g724]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If I understand you correctly, you&#039;re saying:

These findings are non-supportive of string theory, but don&#039;t quite rise to the level of falsifying it.  

Is that approximately right?

In which case:

What more is needed to falsify string theory to the point where it is no longer a serious contender?

and

What kind of findings could bring back string theory to a degree where it was worthy of more attention?

I don&#039;t have a horse in this race (layperson here), I&#039;m just looking to stay up to date such that my beliefs about the nature of things comport with the best currently available facts and theories.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand you correctly, you&#8217;re saying:</p>
<p>These findings are non-supportive of string theory, but don&#8217;t quite rise to the level of falsifying it.  </p>
<p>Is that approximately right?</p>
<p>In which case:</p>
<p>What more is needed to falsify string theory to the point where it is no longer a serious contender?</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>What kind of findings could bring back string theory to a degree where it was worthy of more attention?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a horse in this race (layperson here), I&#8217;m just looking to stay up to date such that my beliefs about the nature of things comport with the best currently available facts and theories.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rob		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the particles at mass 42 eV are voltrons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the particles at mass 42 eV are voltrons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Birger Johansson		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birger Johansson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What particles do you find at 42 electron volts? The Stupidon? Vogon? If you get several Vogons together, will they try to blow up the Earth?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What particles do you find at 42 electron volts? The Stupidon? Vogon? If you get several Vogons together, will they try to blow up the Earth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ender		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, 1000 electron volts. Once it hits 2012 the Ancient Mayan Physicist prophecy will be fulfilled and we&#039;re all fucked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 1000 electron volts. Once it hits 2012 the Ancient Mayan Physicist prophecy will be fulfilled and we&#8217;re all fucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MadScientist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadScientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/12/16/good-news-and-bad-news-from-th/#comment-528270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(1012 electron volts)

There&#039;s something missing there.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1012 electron volts)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s something missing there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
