Actually, my resistance to the “It’s a plane” rhetoric is that it was so damn certain.

“Look at this picture of a contrail. It was a plane, end of story.”

If that turns out to be correct, and it may well be, that will not be because the certainty interjected in the original commentary on it made it true.

It isn’t always an airplane. Sometimes it’s a boat

Go ahead and delete my comment if you think Iâ??m being a â??clueless dickâ? for pointing out that maybe everybody should avoid conjecturing too much. That real information on things like this ALWAYS comes out and 99.99% of the time itâ??s something basic like â??itâ??s just a friggin airplane peopleâ?.

Actually, I never thought it was a secret Pentagon rocket. The Pentagon doesn’t have rockets, and the sky over LA is not where they would put one if they did.

Wouldnâ??t it maybe be better to wait until a little more information comes out before saying â??I’ve seen several sources note that the Pentagon denies that they have anything to do with this. Which pretty much proves that it’s theirs.â?. You sound like a conspiracy guy and not a level headed scientist.

Couldnâ??t this also be one of those air show planes that run smoke generators for effect? Due to the rather dangerous maneuvers they pull itâ??s very common for them to be flying over water or areas that are relatively uninhabited. These also turn off and on based on what the pilot wants. Could easily explain some of the contrail anomalies without having to resort to the claims you are making. That’s one possibility.

Iâ??m pretty sure weâ??ll have a simple answer to this soon.