<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ripley&#8217;s Believe It or Not!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523923</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sailor, I&#039;m not convinced either, but there is a huge scale difference between the case cited above and your example.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sailor, I&#8217;m not convinced either, but there is a huge scale difference between the case cited above and your example.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sailor		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sailor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg
I am not completely convinced that is a real-time video rather than a series of still shots or some such. The reason is that the volcanic clouds I have seen are very energetic affairs, not just going up but swirling and whirling within themselves.

The beginning of this gives a good idea:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaChWgbn18Y

Your posted video is strangely static within the cloud.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg<br />
I am not completely convinced that is a real-time video rather than a series of still shots or some such. The reason is that the volcanic clouds I have seen are very energetic affairs, not just going up but swirling and whirling within themselves.</p>
<p>The beginning of this gives a good idea:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaChWgbn18Y" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaChWgbn18Y</a></p>
<p>Your posted video is strangely static within the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnWOG8Eoq-8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnWOG8Eoq-8" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnWOG8Eoq-8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523920</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523920</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was wondering about the speed at which this happened.  Looking for video now...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering about the speed at which this happened.  Looking for video now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ekinodum		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523919</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ekinodum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/09/30/ripleys-believe-it-or-not/#comment-523919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is a short video of this, as well (oh, yes, NASA also has expensive digital video capabilities)- I think I saw it posted on Astronomy Photo of the Day. You can see the quite rapid expansion of the plume in the video, and as a result the suggestion that the hole is caused by anything other than the volcano seems quite ludicrous in my otherwise baseless opinion. My vote is for the shockwave hypothesis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a short video of this, as well (oh, yes, NASA also has expensive digital video capabilities)- I think I saw it posted on Astronomy Photo of the Day. You can see the quite rapid expansion of the plume in the video, and as a result the suggestion that the hole is caused by anything other than the volcano seems quite ludicrous in my otherwise baseless opinion. My vote is for the shockwave hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
