Comments on: California’s Gay Marriage Ban (which was Bad) Is Unconstitutional

By: Stephanie Z

Stephanie Z — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:47:50 +0000

Actually 41% of California’s eligible voters voted for Prop 8. Not quite the same thing. Either way, a bare 52% majority of the vote does not constitute a groundswell of voices, and a majority does not indicate the legitimacy of a position. And that wasn’t what the proposition said.

By the way, judges don’t have to be on the bar. They don’t even have to be lawyers. And overturning a law for unconstitutionality is not only not legislating, it’s exactly the job description.

So much wrong in one little paragraph.

By: Father Thyme

Father Thyme — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:06:21 +0000

The majority of Californians, rightly, voted that marriage is between a heterosexual man and a heterosexual woman. This gay-loving judge is legislating from the bench and should be disbarred. Period.

By: TiredOfIt

TiredOfIt — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:21:25 +0000

Are you seriously comparing affording all humans equal rights to OTHER SPECIES?

Gay people are people. Man, your kind kinda scares this shit out of me. I wish you’d evolve a bit… much as your culture teaches ANTI-evolution.

Savage.

By: Vorn

Vorn — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:17:16 +0000

Except this time around, instead of the “DUH!” subject being “Well interracial marriage is still one man and one woman!”, it’ll be “Well Gay marriage is still 2 HUMANS”

I wonder what’ll happen when we start uplifting other species.

By: TiredOfIt

TiredOfIt — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:09:57 +0000

Actually Isabar, as a Canadian living in the USA, I just feel really bad for your type. You go ahead and call me a socialist babykiller all you want, it really doesn’t affect me.

I imagine that my experience moving here is very similar to what you would experience if you moved to a poor 3rd nation somewhere. Hard to feel much else but pity for the less developed, for savages, etc.

By: Stephanie Z

Stephanie Z — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:52:44 +0000

Shorter Isabar: Yeah, things really aren’t going my way right now, but just you wait ’til I tell my god!!!

By: TiredOfIt

TiredOfIt — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:24:03 +0000

Yup… and several years from now (or several years AGO, if talking about more developed countries – Canada, for instance), people will say the same sort of thing.

Except this time around, instead of the “DUH!” subject being “Well interracial marriage is still one man and one woman!”, it’ll be “Well Gay marriage is still 2 HUMANS”

And that’s really what matters, to the non-rednecks amoung us.

By: Stephanie Z

Stephanie Z — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:11:04 +0000

A jealous underwear puppet? Can anyone even make a guess as to what that is?!?

By: 6EQUJ5

6EQUJ5 — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:59:58 +0000

At the time I was born, interracial marriage was illegal in many states. That changed, and the haters got used to it. Now this is changing, something more for the haters to get used to.

This was never about what marriage is or isn’t: this was about being cruel. Haters love cruel.

By: Stephanie Z

Stephanie Z — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:59:14 +0000

No, Isabar is just the resident right-wing loon of a thousand sock puppets.