<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: One Year Ago in Minnesota:	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/06/30/one-year-ago-in-minnesota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/06/30/one-year-ago-in-minnesota/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Norwegian Shooter		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/06/30/one-year-ago-in-minnesota/#comment-519294</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norwegian Shooter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/06/30/one-year-ago-in-minnesota/#comment-519294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, it&#039;s the reverse, his lack of experience, both general and particular, is easy to detect: he speaks his mind and is looking out for the average guy and gal. The question is if he can remain this way when he does have lots of experience. A year ago, Franken jumped right into the confirmation of Sotomayor and easily bested the rest of the Judiciary Committee in thoughtful questions. A first test is how he does with Kagan. (I haven&#039;t paid any attention, but I would guess he passes this easily). His &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/18/al-franken-slams-supreme_n_617448.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent speech to the ACS&lt;/a&gt; is great, but the real test will be in four years when he&#039;s gearing up for re-election. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s the reverse, his lack of experience, both general and particular, is easy to detect: he speaks his mind and is looking out for the average guy and gal. The question is if he can remain this way when he does have lots of experience. A year ago, Franken jumped right into the confirmation of Sotomayor and easily bested the rest of the Judiciary Committee in thoughtful questions. A first test is how he does with Kagan. (I haven&#8217;t paid any attention, but I would guess he passes this easily). His <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/18/al-franken-slams-supreme_n_617448.html" rel="nofollow">recent speech to the ACS</a> is great, but the real test will be in four years when he&#8217;s gearing up for re-election. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
